Discussion about this post

User's avatar
steven lightfoot's avatar

Great article. I fully support better teaching of Canadian history. I studied it in high school in the late 1970s(and elementary school prior to that)and at the time, it was taught pretty well (at least in the Protestant school boards in Montreal). This new tendency towards self-flagellation has got to stop.

Expand full comment
Snowman's avatar

I couldn't agree with you more. If the study of history is to teach us anything it should teach us firstly nuance, that in most circumstances people cannot be divided into the good side and the evil side. Secondly that people are a product of their time and making the least worst choice given the circumstances of that time can be difficult. The third is the law of unintended consequences.

You can see this lack of education playing out in a sociological manner for example, there is no tolerance for making mistakes when one is younger, you are expected to retrospectively be judged by current standards, not by those of the, say 1980s for example. Everyone is divided into good and evil without exception.

In social justice, for example, the "climate emergency" is a zero sum game of net-zero without consideration to making the least worst choice. Nuclear and natural gas for example are not considered. The only possible solution is an absolute one of the closing of the Oil industry which will have catastrophic human consequences. Leading to, you guessed it, the law of unintended consequences.

Greg Koabel has done a fantastic podcast on Canadian History which is pitched perfectly, nuanced and contexualised. Quillette (Jon Kay) have picked it up for publication, I will be listening to it in the car with my kids as a counter to the school's curriculum.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts