There is no question that the feminist movement has created a female subculture of victimhood and grievance in some cohorts. There are also legions of mature tough women fighting woke and gender ideology at every turn.
Best described as hysteria - a term that has an historical/medical basis. This hysteria is apparently condoned and encouraged by the government and a considerable portion of the Canadian population. It is afflicting women as well as men. Rational thinking and discourse are no longer the path to social change. It is epidemic and it is sickening.
Canada on a political and social level is rife with what I call the “hysteria churn” for the last decade: Trump, Covid, climate change, trans, mass graves, Trump again and Nazis. Constant shrieking and screaming online and in the real world.
I met Frances in May and it was an honour and a pleasure... she is the real deal....❤️❤️ Please, restack this and share with as many people as possible. We are all Frances, right now.
Our young people are being conditioned to act this way, not just young women. Why? I believe it justifies taking away the rights women worked so hard to get. Some of us are smart enough to see it and will never fall for it. As a woman who has worked in a man dominant job for over 25 years, I earned respect because I knew how to respect others (men and woman alike). I hope women wake up and see it before it’s too late.
This is a clear, honest, and revealing essay that should be required reading for all. The emotionally immature are being used by corrupt politicians (often equally immature; e.g. Justin Trudeau) to manipulate their way into gaining more power and control.
When mothers left the home to make $ and the state began raising (indoctrinating) children the fall began. We are now in complete social chaos with a lack of morality and decency.
Toss in a few million foreigners who bring their own ideologies into the mix, and we have the recipe for destruction of a nation.
Trudeau said he would replace Europeans, and the job is almost done. The goal is for the globalists to usurp the failed state (post-nation state) and plunder it's resources (Mark Carney & Brookfield are digging in).
This excellent article focuses on women, but it describes the totality of leftist psychological regression, both male and female, from rational adulthood back to the childish psychological functioning before rational critical-thinking is developed. We are a world at war: Globalism vs. Nationalism. To understand the shift from facts to feelings, one must recognize the sinister deliberateness of the globalist campaign to offer eternal childhood and dependency rather than support psychological adulthood. Why is this so? Because freedom is an adult enterprise and children are easy to manipulate and control.
Fear is arguably the most mobilizing human emotion. If you can frighten someone enough you can get them to do almost anything. Why does that happen? Because fear regresses chronological adults back to childish psychological functioning. A child hides under the bed when a house is burning, a psychological adult looks for the exit. Every globalist initiative is fear based from climate alarmism to COVID hysteria. Emotional absolutism is the situation of the young child which is why you see temper tantrums rather than discourse. What is most important to remember is that psychological regression is a tactical weapon of the globalist war on nation states. If the globalists can create enough divisiveness to weaken the nations of the world, an enough chaos to make the nation ungovernable, the countries will collapse from within and the globalists will move in to "restore order" and achieve their strategic goal: the imposition of their own dystopian, totalitarian, planetary, feudal Unistate. GAME OVER!
Linda, your comments( they are more than that) are powerful and cover so much ground that I need to reflect on them for a while. I will try to respond when I am better informed. I thank you for your ideas and intellect. When I see some humans busy in their self-centered pursuits I think of Muggeridge saying ,' Work is man's only form of sanity.'
The other factor in the case of the mobbing of Widdowson is that these were indigenous women and their male puppets. Indigenous people have been infantilized since 1867, given special protection status, and special tax exemptions etc. The result is the kind of toddler temper tantrum we saw at the U of W
You are correct in fact, my opinion right after the election was that Carney got the women's vote that pushed him over the edge to a win. I doubt very much that will change as they seem to be determined to end Canada as it exists today. I wonder how they will feel about that in very few years when everyone will have a hard time putting food on the table and when their is no longer a united Canada.
Excellent article and absolutely true. Women are ruled by their "empathy" instead of by logic, and that spells suicidal empathy for our country. This is well demonstrated by all the "useful idiot" women who participate in the hate marches on our streets. Intelligent, logical women think about the big picture of islamic domination, instead of just "babies being killed and starved". Intelligent, logical women realize that 215 "deaths" at Kamloops mathematically translates to two per year, during a period in history when health care was minimal. Intelligent, logical women know that sex cannot be changed and do not champion men-pretending-to-be-women in women's sports or spaces. This concept of every group being oppressed by white men is leading to the demise of society as we know it.
I just read that. Powerful and true. Modern "feminism" is just hateful and such a far cry from the feminism that gave us the vote, gave us choices in education and in careers, gave us respect, and equality of opportunity. I especially hate their denigration of men. Yes, there are toxic men, but there are also toxic women. The men in my life...family, friends, colleagues, doctors, etc., have with only two exceptions, have been men of integrity.
Perhaps this is how White South Africans felt during segregation in 1994 - disarmed, out numbered, out-shouted, and correctly expecting a steep economic decline from hereon.
"Now it's our culture"
"You can't argue with chaos"
Well said!
Many smart women cannot debate any better than they can fight.
Some people thought that our emancipated women would enrich democratic institutions - but this was just a sentimental & “positive” prejudice about female traits.
But if our complicated modern failings include a censorious & squeamish that is typically feminine, then we could heap even more blame upon men - our natural leaders - for not being man enough to properly dominate or win-over the people around them.
The old way that built better men included male teachers, sex-segregation in schools, and elite schooling - and then the opportunity to win a functional place in society (i.e. some level of status).
HOWEVER
I don’t know if our cultural regression can be stopped now given the 60’s cultural revolution (resulting in even more sexual depravity) and an acceleration of post War invasion of the Third World (esp. Islam) into the First.
If someone had written this 20 years ago one would think he/she was anti-female. Now I am of the opinion things have gone astray. I love the image of the screaming female backed up by HR and her ever more sensitive emotions.
BTW.
Did anyone notice how many of those generals and admirals cases were successful in front of prosecutors or judges? They all started as a group In 2021 running in competition with the “graves.” (Must have something to do with COVID…)
Anyway — not one was found guilty of anything. Some cases were simply thrown out before or during trials including by female judges. Even the CDS who was tried was so because he lied about his paternity case with a previous partner — not because he committed any other offence. This whole thing was “me-too” on steroids. Its equivalent actions in the USA for years was one of the many actions that finally brought the Donald back into power. Doing great damage to the USA and everyone else — as Bill Maher says — because the left went too far left and the right wing simply filled the middle gap with more of their ilk.
Not giving in works. But it takes courage... from both men and women. And it's harder than it may seem. For example...
Question: why did you select the term 'gender' when you meant sex?
See what I mean?
I think not giving in - in the case of writers giving in to the gaslighting trickery of linguistic capture that by use grants legitimacy to the term's slippery activist roots and goals - is the most important action critics of ideological manipulation must take. Otherwise, hypocrisy reigns. I know it's only a word and I know it's easier to use, but not using such deceitful and dishonest and loaded terms like 'gender' (what does the term really mean if not a dishonest substitute for 'sex'?) is a necessary commitment to those who claim to want to elevate respect for what's true over what's felt/believed. The courage of not giving in means walking the walk.
What an article. Truly will be memorable. “…dared to speak plainly about a hoax everyone else is pretending is holy scripture, you don’t get debate. You get a mob. You get walls pounded. Doors blocked. Students shrieking like toddlers in a sugar crash. And who’s leading it?”
Virtue-signalling woke leaders, proselytizers, hypocrites, illiterates, hustlers, and authoritarians.
There is no question that the feminist movement has created a female subculture of victimhood and grievance in some cohorts. There are also legions of mature tough women fighting woke and gender ideology at every turn.
Widdowson is one of the foremost.
But I'm afraid she will be hurt if she enters another screaming-fray.
We need her brain. And if some retard bangs her head she will suffer and there will be no consequences for the assailant.
Best described as hysteria - a term that has an historical/medical basis. This hysteria is apparently condoned and encouraged by the government and a considerable portion of the Canadian population. It is afflicting women as well as men. Rational thinking and discourse are no longer the path to social change. It is epidemic and it is sickening.
Canada on a political and social level is rife with what I call the “hysteria churn” for the last decade: Trump, Covid, climate change, trans, mass graves, Trump again and Nazis. Constant shrieking and screaming online and in the real world.
This is an excellent article - very well written. These rraging harridans often make me ashamed to be a woman!
Wow, you had the guts to say this. Bravo!
I met Frances in May and it was an honour and a pleasure... she is the real deal....❤️❤️ Please, restack this and share with as many people as possible. We are all Frances, right now.
Have met her also. She spoke in our community with integrity and trying to get at the truth. No racism or residential school denials whatsoever.
Our young people are being conditioned to act this way, not just young women. Why? I believe it justifies taking away the rights women worked so hard to get. Some of us are smart enough to see it and will never fall for it. As a woman who has worked in a man dominant job for over 25 years, I earned respect because I knew how to respect others (men and woman alike). I hope women wake up and see it before it’s too late.
This is a clear, honest, and revealing essay that should be required reading for all. The emotionally immature are being used by corrupt politicians (often equally immature; e.g. Justin Trudeau) to manipulate their way into gaining more power and control.
When mothers left the home to make $ and the state began raising (indoctrinating) children the fall began. We are now in complete social chaos with a lack of morality and decency.
Toss in a few million foreigners who bring their own ideologies into the mix, and we have the recipe for destruction of a nation.
Trudeau said he would replace Europeans, and the job is almost done. The goal is for the globalists to usurp the failed state (post-nation state) and plunder it's resources (Mark Carney & Brookfield are digging in).
Oh oh Canada.
This excellent article focuses on women, but it describes the totality of leftist psychological regression, both male and female, from rational adulthood back to the childish psychological functioning before rational critical-thinking is developed. We are a world at war: Globalism vs. Nationalism. To understand the shift from facts to feelings, one must recognize the sinister deliberateness of the globalist campaign to offer eternal childhood and dependency rather than support psychological adulthood. Why is this so? Because freedom is an adult enterprise and children are easy to manipulate and control.
Fear is arguably the most mobilizing human emotion. If you can frighten someone enough you can get them to do almost anything. Why does that happen? Because fear regresses chronological adults back to childish psychological functioning. A child hides under the bed when a house is burning, a psychological adult looks for the exit. Every globalist initiative is fear based from climate alarmism to COVID hysteria. Emotional absolutism is the situation of the young child which is why you see temper tantrums rather than discourse. What is most important to remember is that psychological regression is a tactical weapon of the globalist war on nation states. If the globalists can create enough divisiveness to weaken the nations of the world, an enough chaos to make the nation ungovernable, the countries will collapse from within and the globalists will move in to "restore order" and achieve their strategic goal: the imposition of their own dystopian, totalitarian, planetary, feudal Unistate. GAME OVER!
Linda, your comments( they are more than that) are powerful and cover so much ground that I need to reflect on them for a while. I will try to respond when I am better informed. I thank you for your ideas and intellect. When I see some humans busy in their self-centered pursuits I think of Muggeridge saying ,' Work is man's only form of sanity.'
The other factor in the case of the mobbing of Widdowson is that these were indigenous women and their male puppets. Indigenous people have been infantilized since 1867, given special protection status, and special tax exemptions etc. The result is the kind of toddler temper tantrum we saw at the U of W
Infantilised? You mean given land, fed, given vaccinations, and protected from whisky?
At this point they infantilise themselves.
You are correct in fact, my opinion right after the election was that Carney got the women's vote that pushed him over the edge to a win. I doubt very much that will change as they seem to be determined to end Canada as it exists today. I wonder how they will feel about that in very few years when everyone will have a hard time putting food on the table and when their is no longer a united Canada.
Excellent article and absolutely true. Women are ruled by their "empathy" instead of by logic, and that spells suicidal empathy for our country. This is well demonstrated by all the "useful idiot" women who participate in the hate marches on our streets. Intelligent, logical women think about the big picture of islamic domination, instead of just "babies being killed and starved". Intelligent, logical women realize that 215 "deaths" at Kamloops mathematically translates to two per year, during a period in history when health care was minimal. Intelligent, logical women know that sex cannot be changed and do not champion men-pretending-to-be-women in women's sports or spaces. This concept of every group being oppressed by white men is leading to the demise of society as we know it.
Are you by any chance the same Elizabeth who wrote this article: https://elizabethnickson.substack.com/p/the-stupidification-of-women-the-ea1 (Welcome to Absurdistan substack by Elizabeth Nickson)? I'm not a subscriber there, but someone directed me to it. Recommended.
I just read that. Powerful and true. Modern "feminism" is just hateful and such a far cry from the feminism that gave us the vote, gave us choices in education and in careers, gave us respect, and equality of opportunity. I especially hate their denigration of men. Yes, there are toxic men, but there are also toxic women. The men in my life...family, friends, colleagues, doctors, etc., have with only two exceptions, have been men of integrity.
No, I am not.
Perhaps this is how White South Africans felt during segregation in 1994 - disarmed, out numbered, out-shouted, and correctly expecting a steep economic decline from hereon.
"Now it's our culture"
"You can't argue with chaos"
Well said!
Many smart women cannot debate any better than they can fight.
Some people thought that our emancipated women would enrich democratic institutions - but this was just a sentimental & “positive” prejudice about female traits.
But if our complicated modern failings include a censorious & squeamish that is typically feminine, then we could heap even more blame upon men - our natural leaders - for not being man enough to properly dominate or win-over the people around them.
The old way that built better men included male teachers, sex-segregation in schools, and elite schooling - and then the opportunity to win a functional place in society (i.e. some level of status).
HOWEVER
I don’t know if our cultural regression can be stopped now given the 60’s cultural revolution (resulting in even more sexual depravity) and an acceleration of post War invasion of the Third World (esp. Islam) into the First.
If someone had written this 20 years ago one would think he/she was anti-female. Now I am of the opinion things have gone astray. I love the image of the screaming female backed up by HR and her ever more sensitive emotions.
BTW.
Did anyone notice how many of those generals and admirals cases were successful in front of prosecutors or judges? They all started as a group In 2021 running in competition with the “graves.” (Must have something to do with COVID…)
Anyway — not one was found guilty of anything. Some cases were simply thrown out before or during trials including by female judges. Even the CDS who was tried was so because he lied about his paternity case with a previous partner — not because he committed any other offence. This whole thing was “me-too” on steroids. Its equivalent actions in the USA for years was one of the many actions that finally brought the Donald back into power. Doing great damage to the USA and everyone else — as Bill Maher says — because the left went too far left and the right wing simply filled the middle gap with more of their ilk.
Not giving in works. But it takes courage... from both men and women. And it's harder than it may seem. For example...
Question: why did you select the term 'gender' when you meant sex?
See what I mean?
I think not giving in - in the case of writers giving in to the gaslighting trickery of linguistic capture that by use grants legitimacy to the term's slippery activist roots and goals - is the most important action critics of ideological manipulation must take. Otherwise, hypocrisy reigns. I know it's only a word and I know it's easier to use, but not using such deceitful and dishonest and loaded terms like 'gender' (what does the term really mean if not a dishonest substitute for 'sex'?) is a necessary commitment to those who claim to want to elevate respect for what's true over what's felt/believed. The courage of not giving in means walking the walk.
What an article. Truly will be memorable. “…dared to speak plainly about a hoax everyone else is pretending is holy scripture, you don’t get debate. You get a mob. You get walls pounded. Doors blocked. Students shrieking like toddlers in a sugar crash. And who’s leading it?”
Virtue-signalling woke leaders, proselytizers, hypocrites, illiterates, hustlers, and authoritarians.
Unfixable... rotten to the core.