Carney is a Net-Zero
Vote Wisely! The Liberals are Corrupt and Incompetent, Trump is a Distraction!!

Woke Watch Canada is a reader-supported publication. Please consider becoming a paying subscriber or making a one-time or recurring donation to show your support.
By
The election is on! Mark Carney is “asking for a strong, positive mandate to deal with President Trump and to build a new Canadian economy that works for everyone.” And, he has even promised a tax cut that will save the average two-income family about $825. Wow! A whole eight hundred and twenty five dollars. What grace and beneficence emperor Carney has demonstrated to his lowly subjects.
Alright, sarcasm aside. Is $825 enough to buy off some Canadians? To make them forget Carney was a key advisor during the Trudeau government's mismanagement of Canada’s economy? Or, is it enough to cloud their judgement so that they cannot scrutinize him as a globalist elite who relentlessly advocates for Net-Zero targets and the imposition of financial regulations which penalize energy production?
Canadians of course are being fed all sorts of distortions and propagandized impressions of the complicated mess of current affairs. We are after all still in the thick of a nasty post-truth paradigm. However, one area where attention is rarely drawn, and one comparison that is not often enough made, is in regards to the pearl-clutching over Trump’s attempts to end the war in Ukraine and his diplomatic engagement with Putin. The same level of pearl-clutching does not occur amongst Canadians over the uncomfortable ties that Justin Trudeau, Mark Carney, and the majority of high-ranking Liberals have with the Chinese Communist Party. Why is that?
Without going too deeply into the elite world of globalist diplomacy – the United Nations and World Economic Forum, and the like – the Chinese Communist Party is deeply entrenched in and supportive of the ideologies and programs that make up the globalist’s post-national scheme (the one Justin Trudeau imposed on Canada), where Western nations are to deprecate or erase much of their founding histories to atone for colonialism, give up much of their sovereignty to allow international bodies to regulate their financial markets for climate change, mandate vaccination schedules during pandemics or other events authorities deem to be public health emergencies, regulate energy production and agricultural industries in order to reduce meat consumption and carbon emissions, and obtrude barriers to modulate trade in order to facilitate equity.
Clearly none of this is good. Turning to another perspective, the following is Terry Glavin from his The Real Story newsletter: “...ten years ago, the Liberal Party had been transformed into the political wing of the Canada-China Business Council, and the Prime Minister’s Office was the most fortuitously placed Chinese influence asset in the western world. Nowadays, Liberal frontrunner Marc Carney is China’s guy. He’s been to and from Beijing in his various capacities over the past decade more times than I can count.”
And, according to Politico reporter Sue Allan, Carney is a “career banker and climate advocate with the globalist mindset of a true Davos man.” Indeed he is.
The West is locked in a struggle between globalists and nationalists. And there is no doubt that Mark Carney is a globalist. He is a globalist in the way an international financier is, but also in the way an environmentalist is. A deadly combination. Although he is, at select times, not half bad at appearing as a prideful Canadian nationalist – practicing with the Edmonton Oilers helped make that appearance – everything about his actions and track record screams unhinged globalist.
Being born in a small town in barren North West Territories taught Carney, he later wrote, “we are just one small — and humble — element of an integrated ecosystem, while always respecting and nourishing it.” Carney’s earliest experiences were highlighted by the natural landscape of the North, not the industrialized centers where the majority of Canadians live. This seems to have implanted his environmentalist instincts, perhaps even altered his DNA. Carney became a real-deal climate change activist. He even married a real-deal climate change activist. Don’t let his banker’s image fool you, he is a radical in sheep's clothing.
However, Carney does not seem like much of a people person. His thin skin is revealed by his impatience with tough questions from reporters. His nationalism is quaint at best, but removed and distant, while his social skills are even less convincing in their awkwardness. It seems to me that Carney loves the Canadian landscape, but merely tolerates Canadians.
Hardcore environmentalists put their climate change activism before the wants or interests of citizens, and before the imperatives of national sovereignty. To them, the climate emergency naturally includes the entire globe. Not to belabour the point, but there is no place in the modern world where an elite finance person, who is also a dedicated climate change environmentalist, is not a globalist. Climate change activists advocate for the encumbrance of environmental regulations and strictures on all member nations of the United Nations, overriding the independence and sovereignty those nations require to deal with environmental issues in their own ways. Mark Carney believes that the sovereignty of nation-states should be undermined in order to facilitate social, trade, and financial regulations at the global level which force behaviours and outcomes that post-national elites desire. Carney has been a major player and an architect of this sort of thing for years.
According to The Bureau’s Sam Cooper, Carney’s network of international connections “reveals a constellation of global influencers deeply tied to the World Economic Forum and China’s trade and finance arms, particularly the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).” Globalists are open with their plans of “consolidating financial power across borders to coordinate carbon-reduction policies and progressive social outcomes.”
Between Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney, Brian Crowley recently asked in the National Post, “who can best defend Canada’s interests in the face of U.S. President Donald Trump’s erratic and vengeful behaviour towards us.” Unfortunately, thanks to the orange one south of the border, the drummed up American threat is what this general election may be about. Not the threat to Canadian sovereignty from the globalists at the UN and WEF. Which means tragically, the election will also not be about the last nine years, the abysmal economic and cultural failure of Justin Trudeau’s foolhardy post-national experiment.
Will Canadians be distracted by tax credit crumbs, or overcome with Trump Derangement Syndrome, or will they see through the clouds of confusion and ultimately come to the realization that Carney is a net-zero?
Thanks for reading. For more from this author read, The Transference of Blame: Leftism’s distorted truth of Canada’s “Dark Chapter”
Follow Woke Watch Canada on X - @WokeWatchCanada
Or, by contributing to our Donor Box:
Canadians seem to have forgotten that there have been disastrous problems created by the Trudeau government aside from the economic ones....crime, hate marches, housing, health care, unfettered immigration of those who will not assimilate, ethics violations, unfettered ridiculous foreign aid (millions to Bangladesh for "intersectional democratic spaces" for example), drugs and the entirely questionable safe supply policy, and on and on.
Facing the choice between Yes-man Singh, CCP Carney or Verb-the-Noun Poilievre, Canada will continue its national slide into disorder, dysfunction, and disintegration regardless of who 'wins' the election. The very idea of reordering Canada as each of these nits are campaigning to do away from the evil empire that is the US (because of Bad Orange Man and Nazi Musk donchaknow while seeing China and 'Europe' as our 'friends') is beyond ludicrous starting with the harsh reality of geography, our shared history and peoples, and the economic necessity these impose on all of us regardless of our political preferences. Thinking we must alter this reality by casting the correct vote is at best delusional and at worst totalitarian (it seems to me to be a simply a case of which is the least deluded and the competition for that is ferocious).
Apparently, if we can just agree to rally around the colonial flag-of-shame even more under this or that party, we can magically transform these facts into a dreamscape of a either a globalist or nationalist nirvana while the US stands idly by. Neither will happen. But I suspect Alberta will be the first to dive back into reality and adjust its role to the brute fact of a changed international order under Fortress America rather than be willingly submerged yet again and to further depths by more divisive pie-in-the-sky progressivism in all its colours from Ottawa.