I'm long past the complete absence of human remains. There aren't any. Now I'm awaiting the parents of 225 "victims" --- theoretically hundreds of people --- to come forward. It's been a while. Surely the great Liberal leaders know who they are.
Nina White, you are a National Treasure! Thank you so much for the work you do to shed light on the shadowed truth. This tribunal is fully against both truth and reconciliation because while they bend and twist them, they continue to guilt our population and drain our dwindling coffers.
A lengthy read, but we get to hear the Other Side of the Story .
I have know & worked with a few Indians that completely disagree with what is happening , but unfortunately these people do not have a voice to the public and it seems the government is quite happy with that . We are seeing a very corrupt governments and the Indians that are happy to go along with this foolish, but very lucrative line of genocide of the Indian people . To me it is all HOG wash . There are far more Indians now than back in the day so they should have a long look at the terms they use .
Our society rewards victims. But if you choose to stay a victim you have to work constantly to prove your victimhood. Must be exhausting, though it does seem lucrative.
You might like this article, Edward: https://moralclaritynewsletter.substack.com/p/the-great-replacement-of-citizenship, an excellent essay by journalist Nachum Kaplan on the disappearance of citizenship and its replacement by grievance politics. It's long (and perhaps a bit repetitive on certain points), but the writing makes it all worthwhile. He's bang-on about what's happening. A couple of excerpts:
<< This is the disease of post-citizenship politics. The state no longer sees individuals who must obey common rules. Rather, it sees communities whose sensitivities must be negotiated. So the most aggressive groups gain the greatest leverage. They learn that outrage works, that threats produce meetings, that disruption produces concessions and that accusations of prejudice send officials scrambling for the ceremonial knee pads.
<< …
<< The progressive fantasy is that a country can dissolve its common culture and remain peacefully diverse through the magic of administrative goodwill. This is as wrong as a doughnut with no hole in it. A society without a shared identity does not become beautifully borderless. It becomes a collection of pressure groups fighting over the treasury, the curriculum and the moral hierarchy. >>
It's obvious this was a show trial. Cross examination of witness testimony is a vital part of a fair trial. Witnesses were not cross-examined, because there was no defence attorney or defence presented. Nina Green has presented the evidence and the questions that should've been asked if there had been a defence. There was no independent witness cross-examination during Joseph Stalin’s Moscow show trials. The proceedings were tightly scripted stage plays where independent evidence was absent, and the verdicts were predetermined by Stalin and his prosecutor, Andrey. Proceedings functioned as political theater designed to display guilt rather than discover facts, with audiences and participants following strict scripts. In these and other respects, this permanent people's tribunal had exactly the same setup as Stalin's show trials.
“No evidence at all was introduced at the Tribunal hearings in Montreal on 26 May 2026 about missing and disappeared Indigenous children and [nefarious] unmarked graves in Canada.”
First, the Tribunal was political theatre.
Second, there is no evidence. Not of murder or disappeared kids. Not of even one missing child. Not of unmarked graves on IRS sites.
This whole residential story has been so convoluted that truth will be difficult to find. However, there are no mass graves, that is more than apparent.
Notice that every one of the 29 people who commented on the post expressed gleeful support for the scenario of a rookie RCMP officer ostensibly beating the shit out of an unidentified motorist in a traffic stop. Notice also that the post was “liked” by 635 readers, and shared 846 times (where it likely received similar responses).
I guess it’s not excessive use of force if a 20-something indigenous cop does it to an elderly white man (again, ostensibly) out on a rural highway, when no one’s looking (?)
Howard Cameron's career as an RCMP special constable appears to have been short lived, ending shortly after this alleged priest beating. We know from Connie Walker’s documentary that he was viewed by many who knew him as hot-headed and violent in his younger years, and that he didn’t quit drinking until sometime in the 1990s. So perhaps there WAS a complaint made to his commanding officer, or there were other incidents of this nature that led to Cameron’s discharge in 1979. Was Howard Cameron making excuses to his young son Hal about why his service with the RCMP ended so abruptly? Was he trying to make his rash and discreditable conduct (whether it was directed at an abusive priest, or not) seem justifiable?
I remember hearing that CBC interview when it was first aired, and even without having had the benefit, yet, of reading this excellent article with REAL investigative journalism, I could smell a stinking rat. What struck me as the nastiest part about it were the terribly leading questions being asked of the very old priest. Learning from this article that he had dementia and that his doctor had advised against doing the interview, that just adds to the sick perversity of it all. The CBC, publicly funded, should really be called the Communist Broadcast Corporation. The CBC has zero objectivity anymore! Clearly, there is an agenda here.
The Permanent Peoples Tribunal appear to be little more than smear merchants. Would be good if they (along with Cameron and Walker) could be brought before a real court on charges of defamation.
This “hidden comment” thing seems to be new feature here on Woke Watch, and I’m not a fan. IMO, if a comment merits being hidden, it merits being blocked. What purpose do vile comments serve in this thread — other than to suggest that James and his readers somehow welcome them, which I certainly don’t.
Another name for another useless committee that is just pure patronage handouts at yet again at the taxpayer expense. I have a novel idea use all this wasted money to build more court rooms, hire more judges and make the justice system work (better).
I'm long past the complete absence of human remains. There aren't any. Now I'm awaiting the parents of 225 "victims" --- theoretically hundreds of people --- to come forward. It's been a while. Surely the great Liberal leaders know who they are.
Nina White, you are a National Treasure! Thank you so much for the work you do to shed light on the shadowed truth. This tribunal is fully against both truth and reconciliation because while they bend and twist them, they continue to guilt our population and drain our dwindling coffers.
A lengthy read, but we get to hear the Other Side of the Story .
I have know & worked with a few Indians that completely disagree with what is happening , but unfortunately these people do not have a voice to the public and it seems the government is quite happy with that . We are seeing a very corrupt governments and the Indians that are happy to go along with this foolish, but very lucrative line of genocide of the Indian people . To me it is all HOG wash . There are far more Indians now than back in the day so they should have a long look at the terms they use .
Our society rewards victims. But if you choose to stay a victim you have to work constantly to prove your victimhood. Must be exhausting, though it does seem lucrative.
You might like this article, Edward: https://moralclaritynewsletter.substack.com/p/the-great-replacement-of-citizenship, an excellent essay by journalist Nachum Kaplan on the disappearance of citizenship and its replacement by grievance politics. It's long (and perhaps a bit repetitive on certain points), but the writing makes it all worthwhile. He's bang-on about what's happening. A couple of excerpts:
<< This is the disease of post-citizenship politics. The state no longer sees individuals who must obey common rules. Rather, it sees communities whose sensitivities must be negotiated. So the most aggressive groups gain the greatest leverage. They learn that outrage works, that threats produce meetings, that disruption produces concessions and that accusations of prejudice send officials scrambling for the ceremonial knee pads.
<< …
<< The progressive fantasy is that a country can dissolve its common culture and remain peacefully diverse through the magic of administrative goodwill. This is as wrong as a doughnut with no hole in it. A society without a shared identity does not become beautifully borderless. It becomes a collection of pressure groups fighting over the treasury, the curriculum and the moral hierarchy. >>
Thank you. I'll check this out for sure!
Thank You Joan for the link . A good read and points out what everyone should be seeing at this point in time .
It's obvious this was a show trial. Cross examination of witness testimony is a vital part of a fair trial. Witnesses were not cross-examined, because there was no defence attorney or defence presented. Nina Green has presented the evidence and the questions that should've been asked if there had been a defence. There was no independent witness cross-examination during Joseph Stalin’s Moscow show trials. The proceedings were tightly scripted stage plays where independent evidence was absent, and the verdicts were predetermined by Stalin and his prosecutor, Andrey. Proceedings functioned as political theater designed to display guilt rather than discover facts, with audiences and participants following strict scripts. In these and other respects, this permanent people's tribunal had exactly the same setup as Stalin's show trials.
“No evidence at all was introduced at the Tribunal hearings in Montreal on 26 May 2026 about missing and disappeared Indigenous children and [nefarious] unmarked graves in Canada.”
First, the Tribunal was political theatre.
Second, there is no evidence. Not of murder or disappeared kids. Not of even one missing child. Not of unmarked graves on IRS sites.
Nina Green is putting the tribunal on trial.
This whole residential story has been so convoluted that truth will be difficult to find. However, there are no mass graves, that is more than apparent.
This is what real journalism looks like, not the activist slop too often served up on CBC.
Yes! It is a kangaroo court.
For those of you with Facebook access, here's another way to look at that 2021 post by Hal Cameron: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EXNhx6rvi/ .
Notice that every one of the 29 people who commented on the post expressed gleeful support for the scenario of a rookie RCMP officer ostensibly beating the shit out of an unidentified motorist in a traffic stop. Notice also that the post was “liked” by 635 readers, and shared 846 times (where it likely received similar responses).
I guess it’s not excessive use of force if a 20-something indigenous cop does it to an elderly white man (again, ostensibly) out on a rural highway, when no one’s looking (?)
Howard Cameron's career as an RCMP special constable appears to have been short lived, ending shortly after this alleged priest beating. We know from Connie Walker’s documentary that he was viewed by many who knew him as hot-headed and violent in his younger years, and that he didn’t quit drinking until sometime in the 1990s. So perhaps there WAS a complaint made to his commanding officer, or there were other incidents of this nature that led to Cameron’s discharge in 1979. Was Howard Cameron making excuses to his young son Hal about why his service with the RCMP ended so abruptly? Was he trying to make his rash and discreditable conduct (whether it was directed at an abusive priest, or not) seem justifiable?
I remember hearing that CBC interview when it was first aired, and even without having had the benefit, yet, of reading this excellent article with REAL investigative journalism, I could smell a stinking rat. What struck me as the nastiest part about it were the terribly leading questions being asked of the very old priest. Learning from this article that he had dementia and that his doctor had advised against doing the interview, that just adds to the sick perversity of it all. The CBC, publicly funded, should really be called the Communist Broadcast Corporation. The CBC has zero objectivity anymore! Clearly, there is an agenda here.
The Permanent Peoples Tribunal appear to be little more than smear merchants. Would be good if they (along with Cameron and Walker) could be brought before a real court on charges of defamation.
This “hidden comment” thing seems to be new feature here on Woke Watch, and I’m not a fan. IMO, if a comment merits being hidden, it merits being blocked. What purpose do vile comments serve in this thread — other than to suggest that James and his readers somehow welcome them, which I certainly don’t.
More social justice fundamentals ( aka Modern Marxists).
Another name for another useless committee that is just pure patronage handouts at yet again at the taxpayer expense. I have a novel idea use all this wasted money to build more court rooms, hire more judges and make the justice system work (better).