In 1997 in the Delgamuukw case our own Supreme Court decided that the pursuit of its vision of “reconciliation” must supersede the pursuit of justice when dealing with indigenous claims. This reckless decision set us on a course that is ending the certainty of title - the bedrock of any liberal democracy- as well as ruining our economy. Meanwhile, the lifespan of indigenous men has now fallen to 60. - 20 years shorter than all other Canadian men. As Peter Best writes, it is time to end this disastrous experiment and make all men and women equal under the law.
i WISH i could print this article out first of all --- second of All, I was brought to this country, so what do I have to see? well, I grew up here naive about this country, a young lady , mother and now grandmother.--- came here from Europe on the airplane with our parents, I guess this was their answer Canada --
What is wrong with Canada you only have to read history -- Loyalists came here from the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -- why because there was a war, and some Americans wanted independence from the King -- well those that love the King --- came here -- and its been down hill from there.
Why would Canada still love a Monarchy and what happened to the Bill of Rights by John Diefenbaker, sounds like he had the logic to thwart Communism... So how did the communist Trudeau hijack the Bill of Rights --- because this piece of Charter which we thought was our sound constitution like USA is no! it is a means to control us. Americans knew that governments can go roque, and they were smart enough to make a constitution as WE THE PEOPLE.. Canada has too many people that don't care, its a vast country and now we are divided because the Indigenous don't care - they seem to be getting a lot more privileges than us!
You can't amend or improve something that never existed except by repeated inneundo. Even Brian Mulroney (lawyer) and Trudeau said it was not worth the paper it was written on.
If you look at the history, thoroughly, including of Eliz II, you will find she had no power to assent to anything, let alone an attempt to revive the BNA, which incidentally was also rejected outright by the then provinces. SHE did not sign the so-called Charter into law. This fact, uncovered by law professors of the time and put on the record by MP Kuhl in Parliament in 1945, was NEVER disputed for accuracy.
Once Pierre Trudeau failed to revive the BNA using the Charter, he transferred governance of the landmass from corporate CANADA to foreign corporation United Nations effective 1985. Why don't all these 'scholars' ever mention that?
The ONLY reason Canadians are losing in all this is because lawyers keep up the charade about our having a 'constitution', when that is not true. No constitution was ever ratified by the Canadian public. Just because the corporation masquerading as government has made sure we 'believe' in the corporate CANADA constitution that says nothing about protection living men and women from its actions, does not mean we have a proper constitution.
We have listened to the wrong people ... those with a vested interest in keeping up the lucrative charade.
Section 35 is a prime example of when government got it so very wrong. Section 35 must be repealed before anarchy and conflict replace the Rule of Law.
Introduction: I write this as an educator and researcher who has spent years observing how large systems fracture human bonds while presenting themselves as benevolent guardians. When those systems fail—when they harm rather than heal—the damage is not merely statistical. It is personal, intimate, and enduring. Lives are lost, families are shattered, and grief is often driven underground by silence, ridicule, or fear. What follows is an educational presentation rooted in a simple but profound idea: that ordinary people, acting locally and peacefully, can create meaning, solidarity, and resistance through ritual. This essay proposes a recurring, silent act of remembrance for those believed to have died as a result of the mRNA injections, with good reason and explores why such a ritual matters—not only for mourning, but for community formation, moral clarity, and future resilience.
The woke indians are destroying Canada for their Globalist handlers. Suicide of the West is in full swing. The woke government is participating and accelerating the destruction.
Technically, it should have been the same as non-aboriginal Canadians. However Trudeau seniors white paper (which would have phased out the Indian act) was rejected in the late 1960s. Section 35 of the 1982 constitutional amendment basically cemented the illiberal policies (including how the law was interpreted for aboriginals) that had been around for generations.
In 1997 in the Delgamuukw case our own Supreme Court decided that the pursuit of its vision of “reconciliation” must supersede the pursuit of justice when dealing with indigenous claims. This reckless decision set us on a course that is ending the certainty of title - the bedrock of any liberal democracy- as well as ruining our economy. Meanwhile, the lifespan of indigenous men has now fallen to 60. - 20 years shorter than all other Canadian men. As Peter Best writes, it is time to end this disastrous experiment and make all men and women equal under the law.
"... As Peter Best writes, it is time to end this disastrous experiment and make all men and women equal under the law."
Well, Mr. Best, you can't do that using a Corporate CANADA and Corporate United Nations (since 1985) 'constitution'.
i WISH i could print this article out first of all --- second of All, I was brought to this country, so what do I have to see? well, I grew up here naive about this country, a young lady , mother and now grandmother.--- came here from Europe on the airplane with our parents, I guess this was their answer Canada --
What is wrong with Canada you only have to read history -- Loyalists came here from the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -- why because there was a war, and some Americans wanted independence from the King -- well those that love the King --- came here -- and its been down hill from there.
Why would Canada still love a Monarchy and what happened to the Bill of Rights by John Diefenbaker, sounds like he had the logic to thwart Communism... So how did the communist Trudeau hijack the Bill of Rights --- because this piece of Charter which we thought was our sound constitution like USA is no! it is a means to control us. Americans knew that governments can go roque, and they were smart enough to make a constitution as WE THE PEOPLE.. Canada has too many people that don't care, its a vast country and now we are divided because the Indigenous don't care - they seem to be getting a lot more privileges than us!
"Had Mr. Rae and his fellow framers imagined this, they would never have put section 35 into the Constitution."
I don't believe this is correct, as Bob Rae hasn't done anything in the 43 years since to change his mind on it.
You can't amend or improve something that never existed except by repeated inneundo. Even Brian Mulroney (lawyer) and Trudeau said it was not worth the paper it was written on.
If you look at the history, thoroughly, including of Eliz II, you will find she had no power to assent to anything, let alone an attempt to revive the BNA, which incidentally was also rejected outright by the then provinces. SHE did not sign the so-called Charter into law. This fact, uncovered by law professors of the time and put on the record by MP Kuhl in Parliament in 1945, was NEVER disputed for accuracy.
Once Pierre Trudeau failed to revive the BNA using the Charter, he transferred governance of the landmass from corporate CANADA to foreign corporation United Nations effective 1985. Why don't all these 'scholars' ever mention that?
The ONLY reason Canadians are losing in all this is because lawyers keep up the charade about our having a 'constitution', when that is not true. No constitution was ever ratified by the Canadian public. Just because the corporation masquerading as government has made sure we 'believe' in the corporate CANADA constitution that says nothing about protection living men and women from its actions, does not mean we have a proper constitution.
We have listened to the wrong people ... those with a vested interest in keeping up the lucrative charade.
Section 35 is a prime example of when government got it so very wrong. Section 35 must be repealed before anarchy and conflict replace the Rule of Law.
Everything Trudeau Senior touched sucks...
The land treatises were conceived on a false basis, which is rthat the aboriginal people owned the land. I challenge this idea in my essay "The Furor Over Land Ownership" that is posted at the linkedin site: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/furor-over-land-ownership-robert-higgins-81lfc
It needs to be done. But there is no hope in achieving it.
Repeal is right.
"Canada is in a bad way, and getting worse by the minute..."
I'm not sure that Canada has ever been in more danger, even during the second Quebec referendum. And 2026 will only increase that danger (PQ, ...)
This is the new oath of citizenship put in place under the Trudeau regime.
I swear (or affirm)
That I will be faithful
And bear true allegiance
To His Majesty
King Charles the Third
King of Canada
His Heirs and Successors
And that I will faithfully observe
The laws of Canada
Including the Constitution
Which recognizes and affirms
The Aboriginal and treaty rights of
First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples
And fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.
Only legals swear this, plus get vaxxed or be deported. The illegals are free to run amok.
The UN will never allow THEIR document to be altered. Ever.
It has proven very useful so far…
Just sign here, we are good to go.
Come together or be destroyed.
Introduction: I write this as an educator and researcher who has spent years observing how large systems fracture human bonds while presenting themselves as benevolent guardians. When those systems fail—when they harm rather than heal—the damage is not merely statistical. It is personal, intimate, and enduring. Lives are lost, families are shattered, and grief is often driven underground by silence, ridicule, or fear. What follows is an educational presentation rooted in a simple but profound idea: that ordinary people, acting locally and peacefully, can create meaning, solidarity, and resistance through ritual. This essay proposes a recurring, silent act of remembrance for those believed to have died as a result of the mRNA injections, with good reason and explores why such a ritual matters—not only for mourning, but for community formation, moral clarity, and future resilience.
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/essay-finding-each-other-in-the-darkness
The woke indians are destroying Canada for their Globalist handlers. Suicide of the West is in full swing. The woke government is participating and accelerating the destruction.
What exactly were the rights of aboriginals in 1982, other than those written into signed treaties?
Technically, it should have been the same as non-aboriginal Canadians. However Trudeau seniors white paper (which would have phased out the Indian act) was rejected in the late 1960s. Section 35 of the 1982 constitutional amendment basically cemented the illiberal policies (including how the law was interpreted for aboriginals) that had been around for generations.
When you say Liberals you mean the woke globalist Agenda 21 policies...