Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cameron's avatar

Spot on! I have a child at John G Althouse middle school in Toronto. This school is totally plagued with violence right now and the school is doing little to nothing about it. Next week they will be doing something called “MovementX”. What is that? Very good question. It’s a DEI educational course that uses “movement-based” teaching techniques. How do I know this? I had to call the private company that runs the program to ask them what they do. I also asked them “by what metric do you measure your success?” He said, student and staff feedback. How is that a metric of anything substantive? To make matters worse, the school is asking parents to “donate” $10 each to support this week long exercise. This is a crazy expenditure at a school that is already extremely diverse; that is going through some ongoing violence; and can’t even afford to send kids on field trips or even provide the necessary laptops for actual school work.

Expand full comment
Jack's avatar

Using fundamentalist religious or political ideology to make decisions about policy, rather than reason, is bound to cause problems. Charles Pincourt is correct when he says "crossover words" like "systemic racism" and "historically marginalized communities" are used to justify and rationalize school policy. Individual responsibility and agency are nullified if a person belongs to a "historically marginalized" group. The concepts behind "crossover words" are thought to be a priori true, any student or parent questioning the dogma will be faced with ad hominem responses and circular reasoning. Accountability is not a factor for people who believe they are in possession of the truth.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts