9 Comments

The simple facts today are that anyone who disagrees with the narrative from the liberal elites in Ottawa headed by Mr trudeau aka Blackface and his booblehead crew are considered racist, colonials, terrorists, nazis and people who wear tinfoil hats. Whereas he in fact is the most divisive intolerant premier to ever lead this country who has a habit of putting his foot in his mouth every time he opens it and has a temper tantrum every time anyone has the temerity to disagree with him a classic example of that is Tamara Lych & the peaceful convoy to Ottawa.

Disgusting to see the head of this country act like a little spoiled brat at the best of times but when he started this entire debacle in the first place it only makes it worse. A sad day indeed when truth and justice take a back door to woke ideology.

Expand full comment

Journalism is supposed to be a dispassionate search for truth. This "journalist" seems like a hate-filled activist with an agenda.

Expand full comment

What is Sinclair's hold over WFP. He seems to be able to write anything with impunity and with no dissenting (read truthful) viewpoints or rebuttals allowed.

Expand full comment

-- "Informed sources have indicated that Frontier’s focus of concern is an opinion piece titled Fomenting hate sets stage for heinous criminals’ devastating acts, published by the Winnipeg Free Press (WFP) on December 7, 2022."

I don't doubt this "Fomenting" thing is one of their concerns, but the timing of the FCPP's statement (Jan 19) makes me think their threat of legal action was more directly triggered by the N Sinclair piece of Jan 13 (updated Jan 14) in which Sinclair attacks the FCPP by name, following an FCPP event that was attended by Pierre Poilievre: https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/2023/01/13/poilievre-think-tank-event-adds-to-nonsense?fbclid=IwAR1Gxpo53d9bK-vrEmpTvhqf15Dgv8i7xIEyx14zqQMKdqnXeRWloBcqsDM

The FCPP statement of Jan 19 specifically references this event and the activists, political party reps and "some media" who had "worked in a concerted effort the day of the event to make false and damaging accusations against the Centre."

If FCPP does take legal action, I'll be most eager to learn (via the proceedings) exactly which of its facts on residential schools are shown to be "nonsense" as claimed by Sinclair (or, as he says, "wouldn’t pass a fact check in any introductory Indigenous studies class." (Do they do fact checks in those classes?)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment