5 Comments

Agree wholeheartedly. It is a tragedy. We definitely need a return of common sense, to our world, and we need it to return sooner rather than later.

Expand full comment

I think the days of decorum are over. There really is no debate about whether the gloves normally worn in civil discourse should come off. They already are. And the kind of ideological claims being made on all sides are becoming so outlandish that having a debate about them seems somehow so very yesterday.

I am a Peterson fan and think that his interventions into the public domain have given the present Woke Ascendancy something to worry about. Peterson doesn't just take aim and send warning shots. He plugs the targets of his discourse with the whole magazine, which is just the ticket and a very satisfying comeuppance for people who need to be taken down several pegs.

But the problem is that he has the usual free market blind spots, like climate change and maintaining a disciplined health emergency constraint on free movement to save the medical system from drowning during Covid.

And this is why the disintegration of the ideological center and its concern for not just civil discourse, but a preparedness to listen, intellectually engage and rationally assess arguments on their merits, is so very concerning. It can be so easily damaged beyond repair, which is what has happened. And while we can bemoan its passing, the damage is done and we just have to get on with it.

This is not the age of reasonable, but the wrath of God. We are all being affected. A lot of us have changed almost unrecognizably over the last 5-10 years and I have to say, it isn't an attractive look for any of us, including myself. The road to war never is.

The road to war is always noisy

with the barking of its dogs

and littered with sad protests

at its progress,

the anger that it fertilizes

feeds and nests

as all as one begin to play

for keeps

The drawbridge of their friendships

raised too steep

as all the bets come off

impossible odds

the stakes too become too great

no one can afford to lose their bets

and the fear of that

Turns to hatred of those

who'd make it real

takes over as the sun

on civil discourse sets.

And conscience turns to steel.

There is no good or happy end to this

For war must do what reason should

If we’re to salvage much for hope

By wearing down our enemies

Till they no longer have the means

To cope

Or die in the attempt

Not because we had to

But because we could

For salvation is as much

The manner of our death

As how long or how often

We took breath.

Sober is the mind that thinks these things

Knowing that the peace is stretching thin

Like skin upon a rotting corpse

That in due time will fissure and irrupt

All that stinks and is corrupt.

That sweet rancid aroma slowly creeps

Under doorways through the carpet seeps.

Every house upon the street

It will disrupt

And rage will have its day

To sound of drums and marching feet.

Expand full comment

The author writes in this excellent article: “Given our age, he was, of course, asked whether a psychologist or physician or nurse or lawyer should be able to say something overtly racist on the internet and then go to work the next day without undermining the profession.” The political left are vitriolic in their regard for white people and this passes muster. Regulatory bodies promote CRT. I think we all need to get less obsessed by race, more focused on free discourse, and minimize or subvert the speech police in all institutional bodies. Political correctness has addled democracy.

Expand full comment

Well said.

Expand full comment

Professional action is rational 'social' action. The mode of orientation is

through a highly rationalized social system to ultimate value in which

purely technical rationality is restricted to the selection of means.** It

explicitly prohibits orientation to the situation in terms of both pure selfinterest

and the application or threat of physical force in the furtherance

of the system of ultimate value.

Expand full comment