Questions Will NOT be Entertained! - Woke School Board Debates Official Policy to Silence Parents & more...

A Weekly Report on the Canadian Gender Wars - April 21, 2023 Vol 12 Report

Photo by Stefano Ghezzi on Unsplash

By

Shannon B Douglas

This week in the Canadian Gender Wars Report I have a follow-up on a story we covered a few months ago, of a peeper in a Nanaimo public pool change room; another Ontario example of a perv appropriating the persona of a woman to perp on the most vulnerable; and a school board putting forward policies that prevent parents from presenting their concerns about the promulgation of rainbow doctrines in the education system.

It’s not all doom and gloom though and I’ll also share some rays of hope: Parents are mobilizing across the country; there are rumors of actual progress in health policy in Eastern Canada; and lawyers are stepping up to help parents hold school boards and state actors accountable for violating the most basic human rights we have in Canada - the right to criticize the government.

If there is any lingering doubt that woke school boards in Ontario desire totalitarian control over the education of our children in the public system we need only look at the Durham District School Board this week for explicit examples of full-blown assertion dictatorial authority. “Questions will NOT be Entertained”

When I spoke at the OCDSB Meeting in Ottawa late last month, I pointed out that there is is significant difference between school board policy and actual human rights. School boards simply do not have the right to censor parental concerns. It violates the most fundamental human rights we have in a democracy, that of free speech, which at its core gives us the unquestionable right to criticize state power but this is not stopping the systemic pattern of bullying by school boards.

In the last week, parent group leaders from across the province attended a presentation by two lawyers from The Justice Center For Constitutional Freedoms who listened to the long list of concerns about abuses of power in the school system and expressed disbelief at some of the flagrant abuses of power by boards.

Another law firm provided advice to parents and educators about how to confront defamation tactics used liberally by school boards to intimidate critics into silence. Both law firms are actively pursuing current cases and see obvious and clear examples that could be litigated even unto defending parents against obvious Charter Rights violations.

Durham Board, seemingly vying for current title of most egregious and flagrant abusers of parental rights, like all boards is an agent of the state, but seemingly elevates their own “Human Rights Policies” based on the anti-discrimination Ontario Human Rights code, above The Charter itself.

At their public meeting earlier this week, where the new parent-censorship policy was debated, chaos erupted when the board announced it had doubled down on the appropriateness of the controversial book, “Gender Queer,” saying that the committee that reviewed the book determined that it met standards of inclusion for school libraries.

For readers who are curious about the machinations of these types of committees, they are typically made up of activists. Schools bend to partisans and allow equity consultants, who represent the views of very small interest groups, dictate these decisions. Under Equity doctrines, one does not consult a cross-section of stakeholders; one only consults the so-called marginalized, and so one could only expect that special interest would advocate maintaining special interest.

This class of special-interest advisors are the same ones who helped instantiate protections for the self-ID of trans-identified men in provincial and federal law, allowing anyone who identifies with the opposite sex, unquestionable access to women’s spaces.

In a story I covered a few weeks ago, where a Nanaimo mom faced potential criminal and hate-crime charges for escorting the pervert out of the women’s change room, and a local gay rights activist had to lawyer up for speaking the truth, some vindication. New information about the “trans-woman” who was peeping on young girls has surfaced in Reduxx Magazine. (I can’t say enough about the contribution the editors and writers at Reduxx are making to this issue BTW)

Windsor police put out a notice to the public this week, distributing the picture of a suspect in a sexual assault at a local woman’s shelter. Details from them at the time, including gender of the perp, were ambiguous. Covered initially in the local press, the National Post picked up the story on Tuesday.

“We want to thank the public for their support and for sharing our post,” Windsor police stated. “Your help in spreading the word played a crucial role in bringing about a resolution.”

Asked to clarify the gender of the accused, Windsor police stated the suspect was processed as a female and should be referred to as a female.

By far not the first incident of this type in Ontario stretching back almost a decade, one could kindly interpret these situations as men (but not legitimate trans women) exploiting self-id laws to access women’s spaces. The man identified as the peeper in Nanaimo discovered his trans identity during his original trial in the Okanagan several years ago, perhaps in hopes of serving his time in a woman’s prison. It’s hard to tell when the boundaries of reality are deliberately blurred by activist dogmas but there seems to be emerging patterns about when and why many men discover their trans identities, besides when they want to assault women in women’s protected spaces.

Numerous examples of sexual assaults in women’s shelters are evident. At least four in recent years are documented and one popped up, covered by The Sun in 2014, when it was still socially acceptable to ask questions about trans-identified men inserting themselves into places they shouldn’t be.

I promised a ray of hope at the end of this piece today and I have two. I was party to a discussion with a parents group in a maritime province this week where SOGI-Like (Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity) curriculum was mandated in December 2021. They had organized more than 1,000 parent signatures on a petition to enforce and protect transparency between schools and parents. They are mobilizing to engage with their minister of education - and its hopeful to me that since they are only recently affected (2021) relative to Ontario & BC where some of these policies date back almost ten years, that they can hold the line against rainbow incursions before it takes over completely.

In another of the maritime provinces, I got wind of a major presentation by credible mental health and international medical experts critical of gender-affirming care, to the provincial health minister. Participants and people in the know pointing to 4/20 2023 as a day of clarity and sober hope that Canada can catch the social contagion of evidence-based medicine and psychotherapy that is infecting Europe around the explosion of trans-identified children in Canada.

I will write more about this as it becomes appropriate to share

In the meantime, we can hope that the systemic child abuse defended by the likes of the unquestionable Durham Board, the special-interest captured Canadian medical establishment, and protected by Trudeau’s bill C4, can be overcome, thanks in part by the increasing number of brave Canadians standing up for our Charter Rights against special-interest captured state actors.

___

Thanks for reading. Here is last issue in case you missed it - Gender Wars: Mob Rules & Revolution or Fair Play - Splashes, Skirmishes & Battles

There are now two ways to support Woke Watch Canada through donations:

1) By subscribing to the paid version of the Woke Watch Canada Newsletter for - $5 USD/month or $50 USD/year

2) By donating to the Canadian School Board Investigation fund, which is raising money to expand Woke Watch Canada’s research and investigation into dysfunctional Canadian school boards.