What age should kids learn about "felching?"
Graphic sexual material made available for high school students
By
In June of this year, the Canadian segment of the controversial group Planned Parenthood was banned from presenting in Saskatchewan schools. A 14 year old student had brought home from a Planned Parenthood presentation a deck of 26 cards called “Sex: From A-Z.”
Apparently considered a learning resource, the deck includes graphic depictions of what can only be described as outrageously disgusting and deviant sex acts. Some of the acts depicted are outright dangerous, but many are just sickening. One wonders why educators would want to expose 14 year old’s to such a full buffet of graphic sexual deviance. Why not leave fringe underground sexual debauchery where it belongs? Why bring it into schools? Why expose children to it?
But when one consider the “Q” of the LGBTQ rainbow cult, things begin to make sense.
The “Q” of course represents Queer Theory. One only needs take a surface level look at the history of this deviant ideology, to know that Queer Theory, or the “queering” of education, of children, and of everything else (the rainbow cult literally wants everything “queered”) lies well beyond the pale in the Western tradition, as these things attempt to dissolve long upheld socially accepted moral boundaries.
It is not possible to create something like the “Sex: From A-Z” cards without using Queer Theory. The deviance is justified in the theory, as is the emphasis of putting this content and these ideas into the hands and minds of adolescent children. Queer theorist claim that children (younger than adolescent) are sexual beings with agency. They twist logic and moral boundaries into a pretzel and conclude that children who consent to sex with adults, or who practice deviant sex acts, are sexually liberated.
In Barbara Kay’s Alfred Kinsey: The Father of Modern Deviance, a long history of the push to sexualize children is provided. Organizations like NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association) and the Paedophile Information Exchange are covered. As is the disgusting practices of Alfred Kinsey who sexually abused young children and infants in a scientific laboratory setting, but nevertheless still came to be revered as the father of modern day sexology.
The letter “F” in the “Sex: From A-Z” card deck makes me want to jump out of my skin. I cannot believe that good decent people have to share the planet with others who would put this disgusting depraved and dangerous practice before 14 year old kids who are just beginning to learn about sex. Not to mention, learn about it in the new digital world utterly saturated with sexual imagery and pornography. Schools should be the last bastions where the innocence of children is prolonged and protected. What kind of educator would lead a child to believe that “felching” - the act of sucking or eating semen out of someone’s anus - is something that is normal, is something that everyday consenting “sexually liberated” adults do?
It is boundlessly evil to desensitize children to these disgusting acts of depravity. There is zero educational value in it. These images can only upset children and destabilize there sense of decency. Why not teach about intimacy and the bonds that develop between people who truly care for one another? Instead, this nonsense we are seeing is about a “revolution” - the queering of society (especially children since they are the easily led next generation) into deviance and perversion. This is what Queer Theory does. That is the point of it!
The letter “D” is another one that makes me want to throw up and scream into void. “Dingleberry” is a piece of dried feces caught in the hair around the anus. Card D tells us to “clean up before we chow down” on Dingleberry.
The letter “G” teaches about the “Glory Hole” where students can try having anonymous sex. “H,” or “Half and Half,” as explained on the back of the card, is “when someone sucks your dick, and then your ass.” “P” for “Pearl Necklace”
is the lacing of ejaculate around a sexual partners neck. “S” is when we learn about “snowballing.” This is when a sex partner, performs fellatio, then passes semen from his mouth, into the mouth of the partner who just ejaculated. “U” is for those with “Urine Fetiches.” “Y” is for “Yellow and Brown Showers.” And “Z,” for “Zagnutt” is to have “ones testicles sucked by two people at the same time.”
I apologize if the above upsets anyone. I am upset writing this. I actually hate writing this. But, I think it is important to confront people with the images and the reality of what Queer Theory, Gender Ideology, and LGBTQ and Trans Rights Activism is doing to children.
Below are some images that present another disturbing side of sexualized material included in Canadian school libraries. They are images showing the ideology of the rainbow cult manifest in graphic novels made available to Canadian students 14 and up. However, it should be mentioned that many of these and other such books, even though rated appropriate for 14 and up, have occasionally been found by parents in general library collections where all students have access.
The first book we will look at is “Let’s Talk About It” by Erika Moen and Mathew Nolan.
Earlier today I spoke on the phone with Shannon Douglas, the producer of the weekly Canadian Gender Wars Report, about what he makes of graphic novels like “Let’s Talk About It” and “Gender Queer” (images below). I agree with Shannon’s take. He thinks the state has no business to require that these materials and ideas be introduced, put before, or taught to kids. The schools should do everything they can to preserve the innocence of children, including adolescence. But as it stands, they are doing the polar opposite. There is a constant push to expose younger and younger children to more and more deviant sexual ideas and images. Again, this is the point of Queer Theory and the mission of the LGBTQ: dissolve moral boundaries, make deviance normal.
In the name of “Inclusivity” there is a push to present gender non-conforming people as far more common than they exist in reality. And like the image below, there seems also to be a reluctance to show healthy gender conforming bodies. Queer Theory wants to tear down normativity. The de-centering of normative bodies and people is how this tearing down is done.
The next book is called Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe.
From the disturbing image on the cover, where a boy gazes into a river, only to have a female reflected back. To the image of “Amila” injecting himself with testosterone, to the graphic scene depicting fellatio, to the disturbingly violent image of a naked boy impaled by a spear, one wonders if the educators who decided these works should be included in school libraries, ever considered that the images contained in them may disturb, upset, or destabilize children who may be the types not interested in deviance, gay ,or trans sex and lifestyles. I would go as far to say that those students not interested in the buffet of sexual non-conformity and deviance on display in school libraries are the majority. Which begs the question, are these materials intended to make the minority feel accepted, or are they designed to make deviance acceptable to the majority? I suspect the latter, that’s why we now have a burgeoning parents rights uprising. And thank God we do.
Thank you to Pierre Barnes, the prolific researcher and children’s advocate who runs the website Exposing Sogi 123 (an invaluable resource for researching sexually explicit books and gender ideology in schools), for providing the images of “Let’s Talk About it,” and “Gender Queer.”
___
Thanks for reading. For more from this author on this topic, read Concerned Father Confronts School Board With Pornographic Images From School's Own Libraries
And for evidence of the indoctrination of students in Canadian schools, read Yes, schools are indoctrinating kids!
There are now two ways to support Woke Watch Canada through donations:
1) By subscribing to the paid version of the Woke Watch Canada Newsletter for - $7 Cdn/month or $50 Cdn/year
2) By making a contribution to the Investigating Wokeism In Canada Initiative, which raises the funds necessary to maintain and expand Woke Watch Canada’s research and investigation into Dysfunctional Canadian School Boards, Education, Indigenous Issues, Free Speech, and other areas of Illiberal Subversion and the Canadian Culture Wars.
 | A guest post by
|
James Pew, the maverick journalist, writes: “I would go as far as to say that those students not interested in the buffet of sexual non-conformity and deviance on display in school libraries are the majority. Which begs the question, are these materials intended to make the minority feel accepted, or are they designed to make deviance acceptable to the majority?” The latter is correct as trans kids don’t want the limelight, just their school groomers.
Absolutely disgusting, morally repulsive and socially aberrant. What kind of deranged deviant could possibly consider such trash suitable for kids or for any normal person, for that matter. This isn't diversity, its perversity. My children are grown up, but had they ever came home from school with such garbage there would have been a major brouhaha at the school and board office. As to the question when should they learn about this, "NEVER" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"One thing is to have the protection of human rights for homosexuals and quite something else is this promotion of indecency. It would be immoral and unethical to deny the homosexuals their human rights. But it is also immoral to consider disorders as normal. None of these deviances are biological." ~ Ali Sina