James Pew, the maverick journalist, writes: “I would go as far as to say that those students not interested in the buffet of sexual non-conformity and deviance on display in school libraries are the majority. Which begs the question, are these materials intended to make the minority feel accepted, or are they designed to make deviance acceptable to the majority?” The latter is correct as trans kids don’t want the limelight, just their school groomers.
Absolutely disgusting, morally repulsive and socially aberrant. What kind of deranged deviant could possibly consider such trash suitable for kids or for any normal person, for that matter. This isn't diversity, its perversity. My children are grown up, but had they ever came home from school with such garbage there would have been a major brouhaha at the school and board office. As to the question when should they learn about this, "NEVER" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"One thing is to have the protection of human rights for homosexuals and quite something else is this promotion of indecency. It would be immoral and unethical to deny the homosexuals their human rights. But it is also immoral to consider disorders as normal. None of these deviances are biological." ~ Ali Sina
I think I probably learned the meaning of the word when I was maybe 30. Many people I know today probably don't know the meaning of the word, nor care to. I am no prude, but most of this stuff really has no place being available, much less promoted, to even high school kids. Once you are 18 and onto university or college, read what you want. Until then, maybe not.
Oddly, this deck of cards, apparently intended as an important resource, something to inform and to "empower" teens sexually and for whom the activities are within their "norm"--would make the average adult feel like an inexperienced pre-teen! Personally, I haven't done any of these things. I thought our new progressive literature was supposed to make people feel included and safe? Based on the "normalizing" info of the "Sex: From A-Z" cards---I feel excluded and weird.
James this was so well written, thank you for shining the light on this vile stuff pushed onto kids. It’s György Lukács all over again. Just astounds me that so many working in the system accept this. It’s horrific psychological & emotional abuse of students.
Any so-called teacher who would deal with this level of filth in a publicly-funded classroom should be fired and charged with moral turpitude. And any Board that would allow and promote this kind of social degradation for anyone let alone young people in their charge should be dismissed and prevented from ever again running for public office. Society will pay an enormous price for allowing this level of social deviance.
Another cracker, James! Keep chipping away the foundation is following suit. Only the morally adrift would argue for inclusion of this dreck as curriculum.( Lost my full comment to the Gremlins of buffer, drat.) Shared across the board.
We are living at a time when certain power groups think it is OK to expose young students to a whole range of sexual perversions. Because society is contaminated by genetic failures in its reproductive outcomes they argue that they must be treated inclusively. In other words the normal majority should adjust their level of thought and actions more in line with that of the abnormal.This thinking guarantees the ultimate extinction of the species and the breakdown of social order.
This content is fine for 14 year olds. Anyone who says differently doesn’t remember what it was like to be 14 and wholly under estimates the power of a 14 year brain to process this information.
James Pew, the maverick journalist, writes: “I would go as far as to say that those students not interested in the buffet of sexual non-conformity and deviance on display in school libraries are the majority. Which begs the question, are these materials intended to make the minority feel accepted, or are they designed to make deviance acceptable to the majority?” The latter is correct as trans kids don’t want the limelight, just their school groomers.
Absolutely disgusting, morally repulsive and socially aberrant. What kind of deranged deviant could possibly consider such trash suitable for kids or for any normal person, for that matter. This isn't diversity, its perversity. My children are grown up, but had they ever came home from school with such garbage there would have been a major brouhaha at the school and board office. As to the question when should they learn about this, "NEVER" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"One thing is to have the protection of human rights for homosexuals and quite something else is this promotion of indecency. It would be immoral and unethical to deny the homosexuals their human rights. But it is also immoral to consider disorders as normal. None of these deviances are biological." ~ Ali Sina
I think I probably learned the meaning of the word when I was maybe 30. Many people I know today probably don't know the meaning of the word, nor care to. I am no prude, but most of this stuff really has no place being available, much less promoted, to even high school kids. Once you are 18 and onto university or college, read what you want. Until then, maybe not.
Oddly, this deck of cards, apparently intended as an important resource, something to inform and to "empower" teens sexually and for whom the activities are within their "norm"--would make the average adult feel like an inexperienced pre-teen! Personally, I haven't done any of these things. I thought our new progressive literature was supposed to make people feel included and safe? Based on the "normalizing" info of the "Sex: From A-Z" cards---I feel excluded and weird.
James this was so well written, thank you for shining the light on this vile stuff pushed onto kids. It’s György Lukács all over again. Just astounds me that so many working in the system accept this. It’s horrific psychological & emotional abuse of students.
Any so-called teacher who would deal with this level of filth in a publicly-funded classroom should be fired and charged with moral turpitude. And any Board that would allow and promote this kind of social degradation for anyone let alone young people in their charge should be dismissed and prevented from ever again running for public office. Society will pay an enormous price for allowing this level of social deviance.
Another cracker, James! Keep chipping away the foundation is following suit. Only the morally adrift would argue for inclusion of this dreck as curriculum.( Lost my full comment to the Gremlins of buffer, drat.) Shared across the board.
Giving this disgusting rubbish to children is an act of war.
We are living at a time when certain power groups think it is OK to expose young students to a whole range of sexual perversions. Because society is contaminated by genetic failures in its reproductive outcomes they argue that they must be treated inclusively. In other words the normal majority should adjust their level of thought and actions more in line with that of the abnormal.This thinking guarantees the ultimate extinction of the species and the breakdown of social order.
This content is fine for 14 year olds. Anyone who says differently doesn’t remember what it was like to be 14 and wholly under estimates the power of a 14 year brain to process this information.