31 Comments
User's avatar
sunsandwind's avatar

I'm researching the Musqueam band on the lower mainland and their website has a blurb about using this technology to find unmarked graves. Who exactly is behind this story with the power to continue to push it as truth without a shred of physical evidence? It's enormously damaging to both indigenous people and all other Canadians. Who is benefiting? Amazing that not one politician has stepped up to open a full, public investigation. Or not, clearly they are all compromised.

Expand full comment
Grace Joubarne's avatar

Definitely they are all compromised .. .the ones who have spoken out are quickly booted out of the political criminal gangs (political parties).

Doesn't all this 'team' work on their part amount to a crime... I do't know, maybe something like racketeering, collusion to defaud, extortion ...

Expand full comment
Alison Malis's avatar

well, with Musqueam and its alterego MST, it's in their interests to keep finding places to dig so they can claim the land -- more land -- and develop said land free from any petty inconveniences like OCPs and the like.

Expand full comment
Alexander Simonelis's avatar

Terrible how much incompetence, and worse, dishonesty and grifting goes on in this matter.

Thanks for this revealing exposé.

Expand full comment
Grace Joubarne's avatar

As long as there are free billions to be had their will be opportunistic politicians, lawyers, Aboriginal 'leaders' and paid activists to harvest it.

Expand full comment
Rick Danz's avatar

It's an industry and like all industry, they need to turn a profit and the only way for them to do that is to perpetuate lie. Just like the addiction industry.

Expand full comment
Brian Giesbrecht's avatar

The Kamloops hysteria would not have happened under the leadership of any other prime minister than Trudeau - Liberal or Conservative. I’m not being partisan. It is the peculiar ideological nature of the Trudeau government that did this. The actual claim - about evil secret-burying priests - is childishly laughable. It is only the theatrics of Trudeau with his flag-lowering and teddy bear hugging, and the sheer incompetence of Marc Miller, that resulted in Canadians believing that some version of this preposterous claim must be true. Even the activist CBC couldn’t have done this on their own. Canada is a laughingstock. Thanks Nina Green. Keep going!

Expand full comment
James Balkwill's avatar

As always, Ms. Nina Green’s submissions are in-depth and meticulously accurate backed up with indisputable facts (evidence) that shines a very bright light on the Truth.

Many thanks.

Expand full comment
Grace Joubarne's avatar

At what point will everyone stop using the word 'mistake' and start calling it 'fraudulent misrepresentations', conspiracy to defraud, extortion racket?

We all made our first error when we let the UN tell us to use Indigenous instead of the race's true identity, since it incorporates even part whites.

Our second mistake was to allow ourselves to be emotional blackmailed; our third mistake was handing out free money to unaccountable grifters working for the UN and it's UNDRIP without accountability.

Maybe it's a legal thing that you can't refer to the Aboriginal victimhood activists and now defamers to be called what they are, but IMHO, I think we need to right the language before any of this horror against Canadians is going to stop.

We must stop calling a wilful 'mistake' a 'mistake' as though it can be forgiven. It is fraud to falsely mislead another when you have the correct information in hand and are hiding it.

Expand full comment
Lawyerlisa's avatar

Hard one because we do need less division. But we all grew up on the morbid Forensic Files. How many did you watch??? How many seasons? How about cold case?

So we know the drill, you unearth the bodies, and start the Forensic testing there. Then you try to identify how long they've been there, what's in and around the bodies, their characteristics, if lucky the identity of victims and then the mode of death. If foul play then you try to piece together the who done it.

All that there was missing. I kept waiting for it. Anyone else notice that?

Instead there was horrific accusations. (As it turns out by mr credibility himself, By Mr safe and effective, mandate lock us down, "those people.")

So I thought another time to hate each other op for the divide and conquer and decimation of our state and our good will towards others.

Then the law you can't inquire after it. Where have we seen that. Oh it's very sad. For everyone involved. Hot potato that is difficult to touch because we want healing.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Lowrey's avatar

This whole story is so strange it really cries out for investigative journalism. Why did they run so hard with claims many people were in a position to know were false? I think it will be a decade before we really know, before people are willing to be interviewed about what happened in which meeting rooms in Kamloops, Ottawa, and around BC.

Expand full comment
KEN's avatar

Nina Green’s article is investigative journalism. Your question of why they ran so hard with this falsehood is able to be answered now. Reason being that the best we will ever manage is to ascribe motives. As to your assertion that it’ll be a decade before we know, call me cynical but no one will ever admit to anything.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Lowrey's avatar

Her article is great. But she has not interviewed any of the principals involved (I am sure they would refuse requests). I don’t mean explanations of the general “because it serves a preferred narrative about Canada being evil” variety, which might be true but fit any number of situations. I mean step by step: who spoke to whom, what did they say, how did the decision tree look.

Expand full comment
Joan's avatar

You are right, Kathleen; the people who could clear up many of the questions about this WOULD refuse requests. They do refuse requests. One unfortunate result of Nina Green's superlative digging and writing on these issues is that her name (pseudonym) is becoming known and her inquiries are likely blocked or ignored.

Think how much easier all of this would be if we could simply ask Leslie LeBourdais (for example) whether she provided historical background on the Kamloops site to Sarah Beaulieu, and/or participated in the actual GPR survey in May 2021. We aren't allowed to ask (or at least, we won't get a response) unless we are known to be an ALLY of the T te S. Even the RCMP are, apparently, not allowed to ask, judging by what happened when they attempted to question Beaulieu (she was "intimidated" and the police were declared heavy-handed by Murray Sinclair; they withdrew and turned the "investigation" over to T te S).

On the website of the Secwépemc Museum you can download a three-page "Request for Research" form that must be completed and approved by the Chief and Council before one is permitted to make any inquiries about "Le Estcwicwéy̓."

Good luck to anyone who tries to pass that test.

Expand full comment
Grace Joubarne's avatar

Why? It's easy... think $

Expand full comment
Kathleen Lowrey's avatar

yes okay but that explanation fits a ton of things. I mean a specific account of what happened here.

Expand full comment
Alison Malis's avatar

For its "reporting" on this item alone the CBC deserves to be defunded and done with. Gone.

Expand full comment
Tershia's avatar

Too many Canadians are unable to think for themselves. They rely on the lying Liberal media machine to do it for them.

Expand full comment
Peter A.H.J.'s avatar

My COVID experience now makes me believe that the public will believe almost anything untrue.

Expand full comment
Tershia's avatar

👍

Expand full comment
KEMOSABE's avatar

Thanks again, Nina. Your articles are a breath of fresh air in an elevator contaminated by a fart. I think that Canadians fell for this canard because it came from a very authoritative source. An indigenous knowledge keeper and according to the Trudeau doctrine, indigenous knowledge can not be challenged. We should also be warry of other completely unquestionable indigenous folk lore like the Wendigo who has the power to turn its victims into cannibals. Just a word to the wise in this dystopian world we now live in, be careful who you invite for dinner.

Expand full comment
James Balkwill's avatar

As always, Ms. Nina Green’s submissions are in-depth and meticulously accurate backed up with indisputable facts (evidence) that shines a very bright light on the Truth.

Many thanks.

Expand full comment
Martine McRae's avatar

Because the Canadians do not want God, and they want to remove Catholic's from Canada.

The agenda from the Liberals/communist is to lay the ground work for hatred, and removal of what was once a Canada that had deep Catholic roots.

What a better way than to distort truth, bring hatred and division among Canadian atheist's, and bleeding heart liberals that believe so much 'harm' was done to the Native people!

They needed God! they needed to be more Christ like they killed one another, they didn't have the cultural background to raise proper morals believes family and society.

So what a clever way to bring hatred by the Atheist's to remove God and allow the Liberals to bring in communism, after all you need to remove God to replace government as the one source to take care of you!

Expand full comment
Codebra's avatar

These incompetent fools have damaged relations between mainstream Canadians and indigenous people for a generation. The first thing you need to achieve truth and reconciliation is a commitment to truth. Too much taxpayer money is sloshing around and distorting the ethical instincts of First Nations people. The leftists mixed up in this are just contemptible. Far left is every bit as odious as far right.

Expand full comment
Dave's avatar

No-one that I’m aware of believed this story. At any time. I don’t think even Trudeau believed it: just a convenient political narrative.

Expand full comment
I'd Use My Name but Internet's avatar

Did children die at residential schools? Of course they did, vaccines were unavailable, conditions were optimal for the spread of disease and healthcare was limited. Is it a national shame which requires national self flagellation? I think not.

As a side note, thanks writing this, hopefully you won't be jailed for the crime of , gasp, "denialism".

Expand full comment
Toonlydoo's avatar

I'd be curious to know if there is any money trail following these 'revelations'.

Expand full comment