Why Is Situation Widdowson So Compelling?
Thoughts Regarding The Most Consequential Case Of Canadian Cancellation
By
Before we get into “Situation Widdowson,” I thought it important to mention that Professor Frances Widdowson’s arbitration regarding the illiberal witch hunt and cancellation in which she has been subject, enforced by the woke diversity Czars at Mount Royal University, began on January 16th.
For obvious reasons I can’t comment on Frances’ arbitration while it is on going. I can however report that it appears Frances is as resolved as ever to fight it out. On January 20th she posted the following to her Facebook profile:
Below is an article I originally published in June of 2022 for The Turn. I repost it here today for Woke Watch Canada readers in an effort to keep Frances’ case top of mind. As discussed in the article, “Situation Widdowson” is a consequential case, and professor Frances Widdowson is a vitally important Canadian academic. I humbly call on Woke Watch Readers: All eyes on Situation Widdowson.
Introduction - Set Blood Temperature To Boil
I am convinced that the case of Frances Widdowson vs. Mount Royal University is one of the most consequential since the Western world made the infuriating decision to accelerate the oikophobic process of self-inflicted implosion. For reasons listed below, I feel Situation Widdowson is a case which illustrates the absurdity that flourishes under conditions of reified postmodern identity politics. Whatever the outcome will be, I’m banking it will function as a harbinger for the next phase of either extreme woke encroachment, or a new epoch where common sense and objective truth slowly begin to restore the liberalism that for centuries ordered the enlightened West.
Regarding the implications of Situation Widdowson, many Canadians are oblivious to some desperately needed questions. It follows that many are not aware of the ramifications of answers they won’t hear, to questions they don’t know to ask.
Why is this? Because a postmodern condition confuses everything. Those still living in enlightenment rationalism, who for whatever reason have been lucky enough to remain blissfully unaware, or willfully ignorant, to the seismic cultural shifts occurring in our post-George Floyd world, are not understanding the process by which a pervasive anti-western ideology has undemocratically forced its way through the edifice of society into the organs of our institutional infrastructure. An ideology that dismantles what it sees but does not rebuild anything in its place, and only knows how to generate more ideology. That parasitically exists to destroy everything except itself, and (re)produce only itself.
Situation Widdowson demonstrates the extent of this. A loss for Frances would mean handing the enemy a linchpin virtually ensuring final descent into a de-enlightenment de-colonized dystopian future woke Canada. Oh god, please no!
The Important Bits Mined From The Tangle of Situation Widdowson
1) Unfair illiberal cancellation of a tenured professor
For the sake of brevity I will say less on this aspect not least because others have already covered it thoroughly. However, I would like to direct the reader to a website called the Woke Academy that publishes the chronology of “episodes” covering key instances of the illiberal campaign that targeted Frances for cancellation.
An obvious point, but still worth mentioning, is that Frances’ tenure failed to protect her. The implications for the future of tenure in Canada should not be lost on the Canadian public. What is the point of tenure if it is reduced to the insignificance found in hollow platitude?
2) Targeted because of politically incorrect scholarship and for challenging the ideas of woke activists
Not only is Frances’ academic work examining Canadian Indigenous issues considered highly controversial, she is also well known for asking other controversial questions that have an effect on the university, and its core principles like academic freedom.
In 2019 Frances organized a talk on Trans Rights Activism at MRU and invited controversial Canadian in self-imposed exile, the feminist journalist & podcaster, Meagan Murphy. Frances was vocal in criticizing Black Lives Matter on campus (well before the extent of BLM’s corruption was known to the public). And she openly challenged the validity of indigenization of the university on many occasions (Frances edited the book, Indigenizing the University (2021) - which is a collection of essays on indigenization).
Frances is a classic scholar who does what was traditionally expected of those in academia; she asks questions she finds both interesting and necessary to get to the truth, regardless of hurt feelings that may arise from those that wish she would just nod along and accept the many implausible assertions rooted in ideological activism.
3) Scholarship that exposes a vast nation-wide corruption (the Aboriginal Industry)
Is this the real reason she was canceled?
In 2008 Frances Widdowson and Albert Howard published the book Disrobing the Aborignal Industry. And more recently Frances published Separate but Unequal, a book that examines in depth the Final Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, a key body of academic scholarship meant to guide law makers in their public policy decisions related to Indigenous issues. Both of these books paint a picture of a vastly corrupt “aboriginal industry" that benefits from the continued desperation and dependence of the poorest segment of Canada’s indigenous population.
What is the aboriginal industry? According to Frances, It is made up of players both Indigenous and non-Indigenous. One side is Indigenous only, what Frances refers to as neo tribal elites - these are privileged Indigenous leaders (and their friends and family). The other side consists of both Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals. It is a bureaucracy of lawyers, consultants, researchers and administrators, but also, the aboriginal industry requires complicity from academics in anthropology, archaeology, history, and any other disciplines that aid the historical revision and cultural exaggeration setting the premises on which countless Indigenous compensation claims are based.
Frances explains that the aboriginal industry is a highly lucrative one. And while it most assuredly has bad actors who know very well how to grease the system, it is a fair consideration that most members of the aboriginal industry, especially those making up the vast bureaucratic and academic infrastructures, are well intended and simply following the spirit of misguided policies that sound good. Many people involved genuinely feel their work and effort is helping the situation that Canada’s Indigenous face. Little do they know that much of their work and effort will actually ensure that Indigenous dependency worsens.
In Disrobing the Aboriginal Industry Frances & Albert use as analogy the well known story from 1837 by Hans Christian Andersen, The Emperor’s New Clothes. In the aboriginal industry there is a lot of virtue signaling and do-gooding, as they believe they are making the equivalent to a beautiful robe fit for a king. So taken with the spell of the activity, the excitement, and the public engagement, that no one bothers to look close enough to realize that the promised thread, of such quality so as not to be seen by the naked eye, has, in its non-existence, only left the elitist emperor naked and shamed. The aboriginal industry spins falsehoods, exaggerates, omits, distorts - whatever is necessary to hide the truth from sight; the Aboriginal Industry mirrors the "thieves" and "scoundrels" of Hans Christian Andersen’s parable, while the Emperor, according to Frances, is “the idea that hunting and gathering/horticultural cultural features are just as developed as those that emerged during The Enlightenment.”
4) Scholarship that exposes the influence of the postmodern turn in Indigenous issues by showing the connection between postmodern ideology and government policy
Covered in my essay The Corruption Of Canada’s Indigenous Victim Industry, postmodernism fused with identity politics, holds a set of assumptions considered unanswerable by ideologues. Postcolonialism is the first manifestation of applied postmodernism. It seeks to revise history in ways that exaggerate the harms related to European colonialism and to blame the present circumstances of Canada’s Indigenous on the “intergenerational trauma” resulting from the colonial project. The cultural relativism of this postmodern condition ensures that whatever yarns are spun by Indigenous advocates will be accepted without question as sacred “knowings.”
From the essay mentioned above:
The Royal Commission has for decades adopted a thoroughly postmodern conception of Indigenous-non-Indigenous issues. Detached from material and historical methods of analysis, this government funded body (that commissions and aggregates research on Canadian Indigenous issues), ensures scholarship conforming to postmodern conceptions is favored and applied in their reports and recommendations to government policy makers. In other words, this body of elites choose myth over materialism. The effects on Canada’s most isolated members of the Indigenous population are immeasurably destructive, even though the causal mechanisms involved remain largely invisible.
Conclusion
Since Situation Widdowson is currently under arbitration, I will hold back my commentary regarding the details of her firing from Mount Royal for now. That she was so disliked among a vocal minority of staff and students created a restrictive environment for Frances which prioritized the so-called safe ideological space for those who held different views, while making it increasingly more difficult for her to function optimally in the way her work required. But Frances never asked for, nor required a “safe space.” Regular space that grown ups occupy was, and is, fine with her.
In the April 2022 edition of the Society For Academic Freedom’s monthly newsletter Frances published a piece titled “Protecting Disputation: What Is to Be Done?” Offering ideas on what can be done at the grassroots level to save Canadian Universities, Frances opines:
“It is important to keep in mind that activists posing as academics make up a small percentage of the faculty. Their numbers seem much larger because of their loudness and ability to form a cohesive faction through zealotry and intimidation. Scholars, on the other hand, are notoriously individualistic and disagree with each other almost as much as they oppose the activists who are destroying the academic character of universities. Many non-activist faculty also are often opportunistic, apathetic, or fearful, which adds to the difficulties.
Organizing faculty, therefore, will not be easy, but I encourage all who value the university as an intellectual space to start to engage in the coalition building that is necessary to save academic institutions. This will require a three-pronged approach – local, national, and international. Nationally, we have SAFS, but this “hub” will need to develop better connections with local and international organizations.” - Frances Widdowson
At this point it is safe to assume that Frances Widdowson is not just a brilliant scholar who asks inconvenient questions, but she is also a formidable foe. The woke advocates at MRU must realize this. I believe they fear Frances because more than any other Canadian scholar, since she sees through the veil of lies and corruption that woke activists (masquerading as academics) have covered the eyes of Canadians with. Frances is in the process of grabbing on to that veil, and with all her strength she is pulling and tugging, with every breath and renewed effort the veil slowly recedes revealing glimpses of what Frances has been studying and exposing for years. Fellow Canadians for the sake of our beloved dominion, let us help this brave soldier rip down this veil and expose the lies that so sully our national reputation.
Frances has so far raised over $35,000 in a crowdfunding campaign. She plans to use the funds to hire both a lawyer and research assistant to oversee the process of her arbitration, and to make sure arguments are sound and backed up with evidenced based research. Frances’ intention is to make the work of the lawyer and the research assistant public so as to help others who may find themselves in scenarios similar to Situation Widdowson.
When asked by a Facebook friend why she is hiring a lawyer for a union case under arbitration, Frances answered:
“..to be able to provide advice to make the best legal case possible. I will have both a research assistant and a lawyer providing additional information to improve the arguments that are made at arbitration. These arguments will not just be for my benefit; they will be made public so that they can be used by all professors who are being subjected to the "weapons of 'woke-ness'" - university policies that are designed to curtail academic freedom and freedom of expression.”
You can contribute to Frances’ crowdfunding campaign here.
___
Thanks for reading. You might also be interested in The Kafkaesque “Trial” Of Professor Frances Widdowson
Please support Woke Watch Canada by upgrading to a paid subscription.
Has Widdowson mentioned the term COLLUSION in her arbitration (?) --- otherwise known as a Judicial Proceeding "d", according to the legal definition/description of "judicial proceeding"-s in Section 118. of The Criminal Code of Canada --- since that term places the onus on Mount Royal and their lawyer or lawyers in a Judicial Proceeding d., before an "arbitrator or umpire".
I mentioned that she should use that expression in a comment of January 17th in response to her January 9th post [Background for the Arbitration of the #FrancesWiddowsonCase (January 16-27, 2023, Calgary, Alberta)] at her website. According to Alberta's Arbitration Act, a Court may stay a proceeding brought to Court if that matter is the subject of an Arbitration Proceeding, according to Section 7. (1) of that Act. However, according to Section 7. (2) of The Arbitration Act, the Court may refuse to stay such a Court Proceeding if the subject matter of the arbitration is quote:
7. (2) (e) the matter in dispute is a proper one for default or summary judgment.
Collusion in relation to any sort of Judicial Proceeding is a matter of/for summary judgment. So even if she loses the arbitration Frances can still say the word "collusion" on a potential appeal of the Arbitration, should it go against her. However, it would be much better to say the word at and/or during her arbitration.
People, like Brian Giesbrecht (? spelling), Hymie Rubenstein and Frances Widdowson have been proving collusion in relation to the "indigenization industry" since before the so-called "discovery" of unmarked graves in well-known, but neglected graveyards and cemeteries, where children's remains were not placed in unmarked graves, but, rather, the grave-markers disappeared because of neglect and failure to maintain those graveyards or cemeteries over decades of years of utter neglect.
Dr. Scott Hamilton's 2015 report, provided "in confidence" to the 3 Truth and Reconciliation Commissioners (entitled "Where are the Children Buried?"), provided indigenous activists with a literal checklist of graveyards to bogusly "discover" where time and neglect had resulted in unmarked graves which had been formerly marked. For example, just recently, someone "discovered" unmarked graves near St. Mary's Residential School in or near Kenora Ontario. You can go to the TRC website and literally see a photograph of the MARKED graves at St. Mary's --- before the grave markers disappeared due to neglect. Several photographs described as Figure 40 in the companion illustrations to Dr. Hamilton's written Report feature obviously marked graves with some young Catholics maintaining an individual grave site in one of the photographs at URL
https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/AAAA-Hamilton-Report-Illustrations-final.pdf
The illustrations were uploaded to the TRC in May of 2021. But the 3 Truth and Reconciliation Commissioners received them before the close of the Commission in 2015, which Hamilton, himself, proved to me in June of 2021. Quote:
Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:04 AM
Hello all
Sorry for the delayed response since I have been in and out of meetings all day.
The 2015 report I produced as a summary document prepared for the TRC to aid in the development of their Calls to Action and Reports released later that year... The research and reporting was produced under conditions of confidentiality, and in the situation of all such federal commissions, the 'commissioners' are the authors of record of all such reporting. My report remained confidential until it was decided to release it on the NCTR website about a week and a half ago.
No journalist would know of the background reports nor my work for the TRC prior to the release of that report.... While the TRC published reports spoke of the minimum numbers of children who died in the schools, the point was strongly made that this represented a base minimum deriving from the incomplete records available at that time.... in 2015 that number was a little over 3100 names... Subsequent work with the records apparently has found reference to an additional 800 names, bringing the minimum total up to about 4000... The NCTR website also provides a list of names of children who are missing... that is, they did not return home... we don't know their fate. It is likely that this list is incomplete too.
The bottom line is that it has been known for some time that children died in care of the schools. I suspect that a range of communicable diseases are the most likely cause, but the written records are not comprehensive nor authoritative in that regard. For those of you who have reviewed my original report, I should note that the supporting illustrations are also included on the NCTR site, but the most commonly used link seems to be directing people to just the text of the report and not the separate illustrations document. please follow url https://nctr.ca/records/reports/ to see both the text and illustrations links.
It is true that the recent news deriving from Kamloops has had a national and international impact that was not seen in 2015 when the TRC released their report volumes. My perspective is to think that a fair bit of misinformation is included in the headlines and some of the stories. The challenge is how to offer up what we do know without contributing to retraumatization of survivors and families of the deceased... I know nothing about the recent work done at Kamloops so I have been careful to not talk about that story, and instead focus on the results of my analysis from 6 years ago.
Regards
Scott Hamilton
end-quote
So there is not only collusion in relation to Widdowson's university cancellation, but also in relation to billions of dollars of "reconciliation" payments to former residential, day-school and "60's Sweep" persons and to (most importantly) their lawyers --- who haven't proved anything legally!
Case of nurse Amy Hamm and of course that of Jordan Peterson mirror that of Frances. People being cancelled for candid, independent thought. How fettered free speech in Canada has become!