Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Notes from the Under Dog L.'s avatar

A "friend" posted on FB a clip of a man defending his child's right to "gender affirming care" as the right to freedom. I responded with the skinny on WPATH, and have previously posted PITT and numerous other articles of evidence that this is a dangerous social contagion. This should be obvious to everyone and yet, somehow it isn't. After posting sections from the WPATH files, the "friend" responded: "This isn't happening. I don't know why you believe it."

Expand full comment
Joan's avatar

On March 5, the president of WPATH, Dr. Marci Bowers, issued a statement in response to the WPATH Files. It reads:

“WPATH is and has always been a science- and evidence-based organization whose recommendations are widely endorsed by major organizations around the world. We are the professionals who best know the medical needs of trans and gender diverse individuals – and stand opposed to individuals who misrepresent and de-legitimize the diverse identities and complex needs of this population through scare tactics. The world is not flat. Gender, like genitalia, is represented by diversity. The small percentage of the population that is trans or gender diverse deserves healthcare and will never be a threat to the global gender binary.”

WPATH’s executive director, Blaine Vella, states, “This is and will continue to be our response to any media outreach. If any of you [WPATH members] receive inquiries from the media, we request that you DO NOT RESPOND, send the request to us at greenjay@wpath.org, and our media partners will respond WITH THE STATEMENT ABOVE.” (emphasis mine).

In other words, that’s all, folks! They will not be taking questions (nor, apparently, addressing any of the specific concerns raised by the files).

https://unherd.com/newsroom/the-wpath-files-fallout-is-just-the-beginning/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts