Excellent, I will be attending some of the talks tomorrow. What I have to come to understand about the radicals in the school boards, who seem obtuse to the very obvious incoherence in objecting to public readings of sexualized material in children's literature, is that they DON'T see a contradiction. They are both objecting to a a perceived lack of decorum in the readings during public state meetings, while simultaneously endorsing the content of the books for kids. I am not accusing the school boards of explicitly trying to sexualize children, however, it is no secret that Marxists like György Lukács encouraged the early sexualization of children as part of the Marxist effort to destabilize the family. The so-called Queer movement is also not about 'gay liberation' as one might assume, its really about breaking apart the norms of society. Queer literature makes this clear, its a political movement to destabilize. These radical elements, and some certainly exist in the school boards, have an explicit goal of remaking society, and destroying the family.
Among the questions in this article: “Even though, like at our school, David’s daughter’s school only goes up to grade six, the library has an LGBTQ “shrine” like area which features rainbow colours and way too much gender ideology. Why are there any books with confusing gender and sexual topics in libraries where the oldest students are twelve?”
Broadly, how did woke ideology replace education as a school’s primary purpose with infinitesimal parental complaint? Most schools have such “shrines” in their entranceway.
I just watched an excellent conversation between Logan Lancing and James Lindsay about their forthcoming book *The Queering of the American Child: How A New School Religious Cult Poisons the Minds and Bodies of Normal Kids*: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaAtO6fXBlg .
A bit long, but very enlightening; highly recommend. Parents especially should watch, in order to understand what we're up against.
As a father of two withheld children made possible in part by a complicit actions of School Board SD44, which hide cowardly behind the School Act of BC, (in need of reform by taxpayers and citizens), to deny the rights of paternal family contact against the Charter of Rights & Freedoms...it is basic:
Public Schools should answer to the public and be held accountable and purged of indoctrination of youth aka minors.
They are not places of worship, nor "re-education" and should never cross the line of reasonable access and acting to dissuade any student their beliefs fundamental in their upbringing by parents.
In my view, School Districts in BC, collude with state agencies such the nefarious Ministry of Children and Family Development and its partners CPS as unspoken policy to "decide" if parents views and thoughts are in line with government policy and agenda, which is indirectly at arm's length. Although, this may seem off topic, I have reason to believe based on experience that this is true in certain cases which I won't veer into here. Suffice it to say that vulnerable families are easy targets and only those who can litigate at the highest level are able to repel such incursion into their Constitutional rights.
As a corollary to my previous comment, I will add that BLM, explicitly a Marxist organization, had on its website that one of its goals was the destruction of the nuclear family. This goal was eventually removed from the website as they realized it wasn't helping their cause. This goal remains part of Marxist philosophy, and one of the most effective ways to bring about the destruction of the nuclear family is the early sexualization of children. This is all well known.
Excellent, I will be attending some of the talks tomorrow. What I have to come to understand about the radicals in the school boards, who seem obtuse to the very obvious incoherence in objecting to public readings of sexualized material in children's literature, is that they DON'T see a contradiction. They are both objecting to a a perceived lack of decorum in the readings during public state meetings, while simultaneously endorsing the content of the books for kids. I am not accusing the school boards of explicitly trying to sexualize children, however, it is no secret that Marxists like György Lukács encouraged the early sexualization of children as part of the Marxist effort to destabilize the family. The so-called Queer movement is also not about 'gay liberation' as one might assume, its really about breaking apart the norms of society. Queer literature makes this clear, its a political movement to destabilize. These radical elements, and some certainly exist in the school boards, have an explicit goal of remaking society, and destroying the family.
Among the questions in this article: “Even though, like at our school, David’s daughter’s school only goes up to grade six, the library has an LGBTQ “shrine” like area which features rainbow colours and way too much gender ideology. Why are there any books with confusing gender and sexual topics in libraries where the oldest students are twelve?”
Broadly, how did woke ideology replace education as a school’s primary purpose with infinitesimal parental complaint? Most schools have such “shrines” in their entranceway.
I just watched an excellent conversation between Logan Lancing and James Lindsay about their forthcoming book *The Queering of the American Child: How A New School Religious Cult Poisons the Minds and Bodies of Normal Kids*: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaAtO6fXBlg .
A bit long, but very enlightening; highly recommend. Parents especially should watch, in order to understand what we're up against.
As a father of two withheld children made possible in part by a complicit actions of School Board SD44, which hide cowardly behind the School Act of BC, (in need of reform by taxpayers and citizens), to deny the rights of paternal family contact against the Charter of Rights & Freedoms...it is basic:
Public Schools should answer to the public and be held accountable and purged of indoctrination of youth aka minors.
They are not places of worship, nor "re-education" and should never cross the line of reasonable access and acting to dissuade any student their beliefs fundamental in their upbringing by parents.
In my view, School Districts in BC, collude with state agencies such the nefarious Ministry of Children and Family Development and its partners CPS as unspoken policy to "decide" if parents views and thoughts are in line with government policy and agenda, which is indirectly at arm's length. Although, this may seem off topic, I have reason to believe based on experience that this is true in certain cases which I won't veer into here. Suffice it to say that vulnerable families are easy targets and only those who can litigate at the highest level are able to repel such incursion into their Constitutional rights.
As a corollary to my previous comment, I will add that BLM, explicitly a Marxist organization, had on its website that one of its goals was the destruction of the nuclear family. This goal was eventually removed from the website as they realized it wasn't helping their cause. This goal remains part of Marxist philosophy, and one of the most effective ways to bring about the destruction of the nuclear family is the early sexualization of children. This is all well known.