Discussion about this post

User's avatar
steven lightfoot's avatar

Excellent, I will be attending some of the talks tomorrow. What I have to come to understand about the radicals in the school boards, who seem obtuse to the very obvious incoherence in objecting to public readings of sexualized material in children's literature, is that they DON'T see a contradiction. They are both objecting to a a perceived lack of decorum in the readings during public state meetings, while simultaneously endorsing the content of the books for kids. I am not accusing the school boards of explicitly trying to sexualize children, however, it is no secret that Marxists like György Lukács encouraged the early sexualization of children as part of the Marxist effort to destabilize the family. The so-called Queer movement is also not about 'gay liberation' as one might assume, its really about breaking apart the norms of society. Queer literature makes this clear, its a political movement to destabilize. These radical elements, and some certainly exist in the school boards, have an explicit goal of remaking society, and destroying the family.

Expand full comment
Jim McMurtry's avatar

Among the questions in this article: “Even though, like at our school, David’s daughter’s school only goes up to grade six, the library has an LGBTQ “shrine” like area which features rainbow colours and way too much gender ideology. Why are there any books with confusing gender and sexual topics in libraries where the oldest students are twelve?”

Broadly, how did woke ideology replace education as a school’s primary purpose with infinitesimal parental complaint? Most schools have such “shrines” in their entranceway.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts