Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AP's avatar

Well after reading this I went ahead and bought the book, because strangely enough I intend to read it and make up my own mind. No nanny state intervention needed.

Expand full comment
Joan's avatar

Take heart James. If *Grave Error* gets banned, it could be a great promotion for the book!

You mentioned the CBC’s coverage, but didn’t provide a link. For anyone who may want to see it, this is the one that I found (on msn, but it says “story by CBC/Radio Canada”): https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/quesnel-city-council-condemns-controversial-residential-school-book-distributed-by-mayors-wife/ar-BB1kjUBH

CBC’s closing sentence (as always … grr!) references the 150,000 who were “forced to attend” and the detection of “possible remains” at Kamloops. Geez. Still!

Mayor Ron Paull has stated that he hasn’t read the book (and presumably doesn’t intend to), but Councillor Tony Goulet claimed in a story in the Alberni Valley News that he found out how appalling the book was because he forced himself to read it “cover to cover.”

What I don’t get is why the CBC wouldn’t have had enough curiosity to interview someone (like Goulet) who had actually read the book (or said they had) to get some examples of statements that were untrue, i.e. not just “hurtful.”

In the Lhtako Dene Nation’s March 19 letter to Quesnel council, the Nation makes this statement: “This book makes many harsh comments including “truth has been turned into a casualty,” implying that cultural genocide did not occur, and BASICALLY QUESTIONING THE EXISTENCE of Indian Residential Schools.” [emphasis mine]

Apparently they didn’t read it either, if that’s the best criticism they could come up with. They also say, “The Nation should not have to defend the findings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the T’Kemlups te Secwepem’c First Nation, and the Williams Lake First Nation (amongst others) that have been so severely castigated by the authors of the book.”

And why should they NOT? Could it be that they believe themselves (and other FN) to be a special, protected class of people who shouldn’t EVER have to defend their claims or statements??

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts