By Igor Stravinsky (Teacher, commentator)
In my previous missive of this series, I outlined the socio-economic problems facing Indigenous people in Canada and identified the official narrative, promoted by the federal government, Indigenous leaders, and their non-Indigenous allies. This narrative is basically that colonialism, racism, and oppression are the sole (or at least the major) causes of the long list of socio-economic difficulties so many Indigenous people are suffering from today. The narrative focuses on colonialism, oppression, as well as “intergenerational trauma” and “genocide”, neither of which claims stand up to the slightest bit of objective scrutiny and analysis. The genocide claim is particularly laughable in that the Indigenous population has increased from about 100 thousand in 1900 to nearly 2 million today, which is at least four times the pre contact Indigenous population.
Pre-contact living conditions for Indigenous people
In order to blame all the problems on European settlers and their descendants, the narrative starts out by implying that life in pre-contact Canada was idyllic. Students are led to believe that this was a time of peace, cooperation, and prosperity based on teachings and knowledge systems that were superior to what we have now (the Western enlightenment-based ethos and the scientific method). Students are told that people lived well- sustainably, with little environmental impact, and with a respect for each other and the land, with which their relationship was one of stewardship and symbiotic coexistence.
This is presented in contrast to the purported European world view, which kids are told was, and still is, characterized by exploitation and a belief in European superiority. Europeans are described as ruthless and greedy people who just wanted to enrich themselves by maximally extracting any and all resources without regard for impacts on the environment or Indigenous people. It is presented as a case of good vs. evil.
But what was life really like for pre-contact Indigenous people? Certainly their stone age way of living combined with their small, scattered population was eco-friendly, but was their standard of living, on balance, better than that of modern Canada? Were they more moral, or wiser than modern non-Indigenous Canadians? An honest answer to these questions demands a hard look at the available evidence and a willingness to draw conclusions wherever that evidence may lead.
And that evidence shows that pre-contact indigenous people demonstrated the full range of behaviors we find in all stone age hunter gatherer/horticulturalist societies. While there is much to admire about these people, who were able to survive in a challenging environment with only the most rudimentary of wooden, stone, and bone tools, the evidence is clear that, compared to modern times
life expectancy was very low
child mortality was very high
warfare was endemic
slavery was a common practice
violence of all kinds was common
people suffered a great deal from simple health problems which would now be easily treatable with antibiotics and surgical techniques.
It should also be pointed out that while the allegation that Indigenous people were the victims of genocide at the hands of the government of Canada is ridiculous, it is a well-established (but rarely mentioned) fact that Indigenous people carried out genocides against one another on a regular basis, for example the genocide of the Hurons by the Iroquois.
Wiser and more moral?
Students are constantly told we “settlers” have much to learn from the Indigenous people. It has been my experience that I can learn things from just about anyone, so I don’t doubt there is some truth to that. But Indigenous activists like to promote “Indigenous ways of knowing” which they are holding up as equally valuable as the scientific method. What are these “ways of knowing”?
Anthropologists tell us that pre-contact Indigenous people employed a kind of pre-scientific approach, which consisted of making observations about their environment and drawing conclusions from those observations. While not entirely without merit, this simplistic approach often leads to misunderstandings and erroneous conclusions, however, because the additional steps of forming hypotheses, making predictions, and conducting controlled experiments are lacking. These steps are essential to understanding the nature of physical reality. Thus, Indigenous people believed things like beaver bones “were to be burned or thrown into the water to help make new beavers”.
This goes a long way to explain why Indigenous technology evolved so little in thousands of years, and demonstrates that an honest look at how Indigenous people lived cannot lead to the conclusion that they were any wiser than Europeans. Their sustainable way of living was a consequence of their low population and low level of technology. As soon as they acquired European technology such as horses and firearms, the impact was “disrupted subsistence economies, wrecked grassland and bison ecologies, … new social inequalities, unhinged gender relations, undermined traditional political hierarchies, and intensified resource competition and warfare” Based on their actions, it is not really fair to claim that Indigenous people were any wiser than Europeans, nor can contemporary Indigenous people be considered wiser or more moral than modern day non Indigenous people.
In my next installment of this series, I will look at the early contact period, a period which is largely glossed over in schools today. It was during this period that Indigenous people made a major switch from subsistence hunter-gatherer horticulturalism to economic engagement with the newcomers.
___
Thanks for reading. For more from this author, read There’s a Teacher Shortage in Ontario
BREAKING NEWS:
A new long-form essay by Dr. M - Fulcrum and Pivot: The New Left Remaking of Toronto School Policy
James Pew has contributed a chapter to the new book Grave Error: How The Media Misled us (And the Truth about Residential Schools). You can read about it here - The Rise of Independent Canadian Researchers
Also, for more evidence of the ideological indoctrination in Canadian education, read Yes, schools are indoctrinating kids! And also, Yes, The University is an Indoctrination Camp!
There are now two ways to support Woke Watch Canada through donations:
1) By subscribing to the paid version of the Woke Watch Canada Newsletter for - $7 Cdn/month or $70 Cdn/year
2) By making a contribution to the Investigating Wokeism In Canada Initiative, which raises the funds necessary to maintain and expand Woke Watch Canada’s research and investigation into Dysfunctional Canadian School Boards, Education, Indigenous Issues, Free Speech, and other areas of Illiberal Subversion and the Canadian Culture Wars.
Irish explorer Henry Ellis (1721-1806), in *A voyage to Hudson’s Bay, by the Dobbs Galley and California, in the years 1746 and 1747*, wrote the following about the indigenous understanding of the population ecology of deer (spelling etc. as in original, which can be found on the Internet Archive):
<< They have no Dependance upon the Fruits of the Earth for their Subsistance, living entirely on the Animals they take in Hunting or Trapping, at which they are very dexterous. They make prodigious Slaughter every Season among the Deer, from an unaccountable Notion that the more they destroy, the greater Plenty will succeed; therefore sometimes they leave three or four hundred dead on the Plain, taking out of them only their Tongues, and leaving their Carcasses either to rot, or be devoured by the wild Beasts. At other times they attack them in the Water, and kill prodigious Numbers, which they bring down on Floats to the Factories. [The deer take to the water to escape the gnats and mosquitos, and are an easy target there for the Indians.] >>
Seems these guys weren't even bothering to burn the bones to make more deer! They just had a knowing that more deer would keep coming (and of course they did, for a while), and attributed the seasonal abundance to the previous year's abundant slaughter.
Thanks for this series, Igor -- and especially for today's link to the History Cooperative article with its wonderful notes and bibliography! (Some reading for me later when the sun goes down.)